c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel

Updates from January, 2012

  • BMW overtook Mercedes-Benz in a surprise upset Thursday to grab the crown of best-selling luxury brand in the United States after an incentive-fuelled race to the finish of 2011.

    The upset came after Autodata declared Mercedes the champion Wednesday using data gleaned from a “credible industry source” after neither automaker had reported their results on the industry’s standard reporting day.

    “I have great confidence that 2012 will be even better especially with the all-new BMW 3 Series arriving in the U.S. in February with more new and refreshed models coming in the months after,” said Ludwig Willisch, chief executive officer of BMW of North America.

    With the champion of the past 11 years — Lexus — hobbled by the fallout from Japan’s devastating March 11 earthquake and tsunami, the two Teutonic giants went head-on to snatch the highly visible symbol of automotive supremacy.

    Mercedes pulled ahead in November thanks to the launch of its new 2012 C-Class sedan and was expected to end up the victor. But BMW regained the lead and claimed first place with a lead of just more than 2,600 vehicles.

    BMW reported Thursday its U.S. sales rose 12.6% in 2011 to 247,907 after posting a 15% gain in December. Mercedes reported a 13.3% gain to a record 245,231 vehicles sold in 2011 after a 28% jump in December sales. Lexus finished a distant third as 2011 sales dropped 13% to 198,552.

    BMW raised its incentive spending more than $200 to $3,694 per vehicle sold from November to December, while Mercedes’ average spend remained virtually flat at $3,174, Edmunds.com found. The average discount percentage on a new BMW in December was 11.2% off the sticker price, compared to 9.5% for a new Mercedes, the automotive web site determined.


    7:17 pm on January 5, 2012
     
  • It must be an age thing, because I have never truly understood why the younger generation supposedly thinks a box on wheels is cool. Honda gave it a run with the recently discontinued Element. Nissan has the Cube, Kia the Soul and Toyota Canada, with its importation of its youth-oriented Scion brand from the United States, has the xB. (Ford’s Flex crossover could be considered the über box on wheels, but its demographic is far older and more monetarily flush than the others.)

    Practical I understand. A box is practical. A box holds stuff. Wagons are boxy. So are sport-utes. Both hold stuff. But wagons and sport-utes can also be stylish and cool — think Cadillac CTS Wagon or Nissan Murano, to name a couple. Boxes on wheels such as the Element, the Cube and — the test subject — Scion xB? Not so much. (I admit the Soul has a certain funky charm to it.)

    Now, automotive marketing information company J.D. Power and Associates’ profile of a typical xB buyer states the “urban utility vehicle” (Toyota-speak) has a younger clientele than do most vehicles in its segment. Since I am firmly entrenched in middle age, I asked my daughter — currently saving for wheels — and a member of the Scion’s intended youthful audience, if the xB held appeal. Admittedly, I had a clue to her answer. The first time I brought an Element home, she nailed it to the wall by calling it the “butt-ugly car” and shielded her eyes in mock horror. My guess to her probable opinion of the xB was dead on. “Dad, it’s like driving a moving van.”

    What about all the accessories available to personalize the car and give it a more distinct identity? I pressed. “No matter how your wrap it, a box is still a box,” she said.

    OK, then, no sale to this university graduate; time to change mindset. From a strictly functional viewpoint, how does the Scion fare? Well, being a box, interior dimensions are most impressive given its overall size. Headroom and legroom are almost excessive when compared with other compact cars. Getting in and out of the cabin, whether through the front doors or the back doors, is a breeze, which has me thinking it would make a practical car for someone with infirmities. Visibility is good for the most part, although the letterbox-shaped front windshield is a little off-putting at first, contributing to a slight claustrophobic feeling that is at odds with the cabin’s roominess. The windshield pillars are also fairly thick. Ditto the rear pillars, which make mirror placement critical for checking blind spots.

    THE SPECS

    Type of vehicle: Front-wheel-drive compact utility vehicle
    Engine: 2.4L DOHC four-cylinder
    Power: 158 hp @ 6,000 rpm; 162 lb-ft of torque @ 4,000 rpm
    Transmission: Four-speed manumatic (optional)
    Brakes: Four-wheel disc with ABS
    Tires: P205/55R16
    Price: base/as tested: $18,270/$19,290
    Destination charge: $1,390
    Transport Canada fuel economy L/100 km: 9.5 city, 7.2 hwy.

    Behind the 60/40-split fold-flat back seats, there’s a roomy 21.7 cubic feet of cargo space, with a flat floor to meet the needs of the youth market’s supposedly active lifestyles. Strangely enough, it’s also a convenient place to stash groceries.

    Inside, the cabin showcases the xB’s budget-based price of $18,270, albeit with some thoughtful touches to alleviate the abundance of textured plastic. For interior storage the xB offers a driver’s convenience tray, a glove box, a console box and front door storage. Beneath the rear seats a fixed tray provides hidden storage and can accommodate small items such as cameras, laptops, CDs, etc.

    The instrument gauge cluster, including the speedometer and deep orange multi-information display, sits centred on the metal tone-accented dash. Frankly, I wish Toyota would stop this practice and place the pod in front of the driver where it belongs. Upon starting the engine, “xB” flashes on the information display and one can toggle through the clock, outside temperature, instantaneous fuel economy, average fuel economy, distance to empty, trip timer or the average speed.

    Actually, once past the car’s polarizing looks and debatable marketing quest, the xB is not a bad-driving rig. Sharing the same platform as Toyota’s Matrix, the Scion is powered by a surprisingly smooth 2.4-litre DOHC four-cylinder with Variable Valve Timing with intelligence (VVT-i) mated to a standard five-speed manual transmission (a four-speed manumatic is optional). While not overly muscular at 158 horsepower and 162 pound-feet of torque, it doesn’t have to contend with too much bulk — the xB tips the scales at 1,399 kilograms. As such, the box posts acceleration times competitive for small entry-level cars — 9.9 seconds to get from zero to 100 kilometres an hour and 7.9 seconds to pull off an 80-to-120 passing manoeuvre. Fuel economy isn’t that bad, either; I averaged 9.5 litres per 100 km in a mix of highway and suburban commuting.

    Although sports car handling isn’t the xB’s forte, it isn’t nearly as tippy as it might appear — the front MacPherson strut and rear torsion beam suspension does yeoman work in keeping the car settled. Plus, the brakes — 10.8-inch ventilated discs in the front and 11-inch discs in the rear, with standard ABS — have the Scion coming to a controlled stop from 100 km/h in 43.7 metres.

    Credit where it’s due, the xB doesn’t scrimp on the safety front. In addition to the four-wheel anti-lock brakes with electronic brake-force distribution and brake assist, a full complement of air bags, vehicle stability control with traction control and a first-aid kit are all standard.

    There is genuine value and utility to the xB, both of which underscore the fact it would make a great little runabout for someone with a need to haul stuff and who is looking for an economical first car. But, for me, it’s almost impossible to get beyond this Scion’s anti-style.

    Ultimately, the xB reminds me of a line of dialogue from the great sci-fi movie Planet of the Apes. Toward the end, Charlton Heston’s character, Col. Taylor, says to the ape Doctor Zira: “Doctor, I’d like to kiss you goodbye.”

    Zira: “Alright, but you’re so damned ugly.”


    2:00 pm on December 27, 2011
     
  • As is rapidly becoming the norm, the L.A. Auto Show was being promoted as a green fest. Nestled among the mega-horsepower monsters were the usual hybrid/electric rides that are growing in number. As such, there were plenty of green rides and the opportunity to test many of them in a short drive. However, not all was hunky-dory — there was an underlying theme that spoke to the la-la land syndrome.

    The first was Coda Automotive’s electric car. The Coda EV’s hardware consists of a 36-kWh lithium ion phosphate battery, the required power electronics and an electric motor that produces 136 horsepower and 221 pound-feet of torque. The company claims the EV will drive up to 240 kilometres on a single charge. It also says it has the fastest charge rate on the market — two hours for an 80-km charge, four hours for a 160-km charge and, by extension, six hours for a full charge using a 220-volt/30-amp outlet. So far, so good. Where it all came unravelled was in the car’s styling outside and in. The EV looked, and was finished, like a car from a decade or more ago. The materials were marginal, as was the build quality — and the style was bland to the point where it made a meal of dry toast seem appealing.

    Finally, the representative suggested that the battery has a life expectancy of 20 years, which, she proclaimed with a straight face, is why the company warrants it for 10 years or 160,000 kilometres. Why peg the warranty at half the expected life? The answer was not forthcoming. The other hitch is cost — the Coda EV is priced at $39,900, which is all but the same as the Nissan Leaf and Chevrolet Volt.

    The second anomaly was the Green Car of the Year award, which is presented annually by the Green Car Journal. Along with the Journal’s editors, the jury includes Carl Pope, chairman of the Sierra Club,?Frances Beinecke, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, Jean-Michel Cousteau, president of Ocean Futures Society, Matt Petersen, president of Global Green USA, Jay Leno, host of the Tonight Show and Post Driving columnist, and automotive legend Carroll Shelby. This year, this esteemed group picked the natural gas-powered Honda Civic over the Ford Focus Electric, Mitsubishi i-MiEV, Toyota Prius V hybrid and the Volkswagen Passat TDI clean diesel.

    Usually, I’m on side with the Journal’s choice. This year, I am not. Certainly, the natural gas-powered Civic is clean and more than green, and it is typically Honda in that the car’s execution is first rate. As such, it might be a worthy winner but for one key factor — this derivative of the Civic is offered in limited numbers and only in select areas of the United States. In all, it is retailed in 36 states through a network of 200 dealers. It is not offered in Canada, which also means that its availability is far from being North America-wide.

    To my mind, the Toyota Prius V or Volkswagen Passat TDI would have made far more worthy winners. Although neither is cleaner than the Civic, the cumulative effect of the emissions removed by recognizing something other than a niche vehicle would have had a significantly larger effect on the environment — one-third of all VWs sold in Canada are diesel-powered. That, given the TDI’s cleanliness and operational efficiency, is a significant number, one that puts a big dent in pollution while lightening the load on one’s wallet.

    On a brighter note, the Doking XD provided the answer to environmental and congestion concerns. Here’s a three-seat electric vehicle that is about the size of a Smart fortwo. It is a funky-looking piece with a pair of scissor-hinged doors and tail lights that form an X — the inner portion of the X then forms an arrow indicating the direction of a turn.

    Inside, the driver sits in the middle of the vehicle with the other two passengers flanking the central seat on the outboard sides of the cabin. Yes, it is tight, especially for the rear riders, but it proved to be more comfortable than the description implies.

    There are two Doking models available ­— the XD2 and XD4. The difference is found in the number of electric motors. The XD2 features a pair of motors that produces a combined output of 120 hp and 265 lb-ft of torque. The XD4 doubles the number of motors and the respective output — with 220 hp and 530 lb-ft of torque on tap. Doking claims the XD4 will accelerate to 100 kilometres an hour in 4.2 seconds. The motors get their power from a 33-kWh lithium ion phosphate battery that delivers a claimed range of 170 km when the average speed of the drive is 80 km/h. Given that real-world commutes are usually conducted at an average driving speed of about half that suggests that the actual driving distance will be more than 200 km. The Doking XD2 starts at $50,000 and is only built on an as- ordered basis.


    2:00 pm on November 24, 2011