c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel

Updates from May, 2012

  • How often have you sold something and even at the moment of the transaction known it was a mistake, at least emotionally if not monetarily? I have to admit that this has happened to me on far more than one occasion.

    Looking back, I think the very first time I had an acute attack of seller’s remorse was in the early 1980s. I had been the proud owner of a 1952 Dodge M series weapons carrier, an old military vehicle. I had bought it surplus for $800, which matched its mileage perfectly as it had 800 miles (1,287 kilometres) on it. I drove it for several years and restored it to exactly mimic a Korean War truck used by the 101 Airborne, the Screaming Eagles. That truck and I had many adventures. But when I moved back to the Toronto area, it seemed not quite as sensible a choice of transport as when I had lived north of Kitchener-Waterloo.

    I don’t remember who bought it, but I do vividly remember it being driven away, up the road and out of my life. It was replaced by a lightly used six-month-old Volkswagen Sirocco, undoubtedly the worst car I have ever owned, but that is another story.

    I had a string of I-don’t-care vehicles for years after. It was not until I had established the restoration business that I ended up selling another vehicle I have since always missed. It was another truck, a 1942 one-ton Fargo stake truck, one of six produced for the civilian market in 1942 and delivered to a farm near London, Ont. All the rest of Fargo production that year was military trucks.

    It was a lovely thing, much fancier than its Dodge counterpart and very art deco in design. It wasn’t fast, but it didn’t care how much it carried — it still did 72 kilometres an hour. It was a lovely creature, but I had moved about 50 km from work at the time, so I didn’t use it. It sat forlorn outside the shop as I didn’t have inside storage room for it. The weather soon started to have its way with the old thing and, after putting only 10 km on it in an entire year, I sold it — for its own sake.

    Of course, not a month after selling it, I came across a property that I couldn’t  pass up and ended up living less than four km from work, an easy drive for the old girl, but, alas, too late. I still have pangs. I would love her back as she could be put to work hauling hay and doing chores back on the farm. I am 50 km away again but in the opposite direction. With a farm, I could really use a good old stake truck. My vintage long-wheelbase military Land Rover, which I almost sold, lives there (are we sensing a theme here?) and does fencing duties and small tasks around the property. This keeps it healthy and useful and I have an excuse to keep it.

    My next lost love is a car, but one that Ettore Bugatti called the world’s fastest truck. It was a 1929 4.2-litre Lemans Bentley and perhaps the greatest vehicular love affair of my life. I acquired it with a partner and there’s the rub. If I didn’t have a partner, then I would never have sold it. However, if I didn’t have a partner, then I would never have bought it, so I guess having it for a while was better than never having it at all. The car was like a great green leather-covered train with Union Jacks painted on the sides. I revelled in driving it well above the speed limit wherever we went, quite simply hoping for a ticket so I could go to court and brag to the judge, “Yes, Your Honour, I was doing 110 in an 80, but it was in a 1929 Bentley!”

    My partner never got the car, which always surprised me as he usually had great taste in both art and cars. At his urging (nagging), we sold it. We got somewhere around $250,000 for it, but I hated the sale. I hate it even more now on a more mercenary level.  If I were to get the opportunity to buy it back, I would have to pony up almost $1-million and that is not happening any time soon. I could have sold it for the same amount and that would certainly have taken the edge off the pain of loss.

    The last breakup I had was with my supercharged Lotus Exige, a car that is about as far from being a truck as it’s possible to get. While I traded it for a Lotus Evora, a great car in its own right, the Evora is civilized and refined, a luxurious sport car. The Exige was a little savage, hard to get into and out of, featuring a Spartan interior, no real vision out the window as the engine is in the way and with a suspension that is painfully unkind to full bladders and intolerant of mistakes. It was, in short, a driver’s car, and I missed it the moment I penned the deal on the new Evora.

    The one consolation is that, unlike lost love with high school crushes and old girlfriends, you can promise yourself that one day you’ll have another  just like the one that got away.


    8:00 am on May 15, 2012
     
  • Beijing • On the Eve of Auto China 2012, held this year in Beijing, Volkswagen Group, which includes Volkswagen, Audi, Bentley, Bugatti, Lamborghini, Porsche, Seat and Skoda, used the famed Water Cube to showcase its future wares — the very place Michael Phelps used to turn the swimming world on its ear.

    Why go to such extraordinary lengths? Potential.

    While the United States and Germany remain strong markets for the VW Group, it is China that leads the way — of the Group’s almost 2.2-million vehicles delivered in the first quarter of 2012, 30% went to China. Here are some of the highlights from Auto China 2012:

    Graeme Fletcher for National Post

    The Bugatti Veyron 16.4 Grand Sport Vitesse is powered by a monster 7.9-litre W16 engine that delivers warp-like speed and has a thirst for fuel that’s second to none.

    Bugatti Veyron 16.4 Grand Sport Vitesse

    The Veyron 16.4 Grand Sport Vitesse is powered by a monster 7.9-litre W16 engine that delivers warp-like speed and has a thirst for fuel that’s second to none. With a maximum output of 1,200 horsepower and a mind-numbing 1,106 pound-feet of torque on tap, this open-top speedster runs to 100 kilometres an hour in 2.9 seconds and on to its top speed of 410 km/h! Perhaps more remarkable is that the chassis and race-derived suspension give the Bugatti a claimed lateral acceleration of 1.4 g! Now, lest you think that speed and ultra-high lateral g-forces would ruffle the occupants’ hair, fear not — with the windbreak in place, Bugatti says holding a normal conversation at 200 km/h is still entirely possible. I can hear it now. “Will you slow down or I’m getting out.” “Yes, dear.”

    Porsche Cayenne GTS

    The Cayenne GTS, shown at top, which sits between the S and Turbo models, arrives with a meaner look and a 24-millimetre lower ride height. Along with its beefed up look — the larger air inlets in the front fascia being the biggest giveaway — comes a 4.8-litre V8 engine that pushes 420 hp and 380 lb-ft of torque through an eight-speed manumatic and all four wheels. The net result is a monster truck that runs from rest to 100 km/h in 5.7 seconds and on to a top speed of 261 km/h. Remarkably, the penalty for the extra power and performance is pegged at just 0.2 litres per 100 kilometres more than the base Cayenne S. To ensure the requisite sound emanates from the engine, Porsche has included its twin-flow Sound Symposer system. Essentially, two acoustic channels are linked to the A-pillars. When the driver hammers the gas, flaps in the channels open, giving the occupants an aural treat by amping up the intake noise. Of course, while all of this is going on, flaps in the exhaust are opened to give the GTS a snappy snarl.


    Graeme Fletcher for National Post

    Following on the heels of the debut of the tin-top electric Bug comes the Volkswagen E-Bugster, a sassy-looking convertible that’s powered by an 85-kilowatt electric motor.

    Volkswagen E-Bugster

    Following on the heels of the debut of the tin-top electric Bug comes the E-Bugster, a sassy-looking convertible that’s powered by an 85-kilowatt electric motor. It gets its power from a 28.3-kWh lithium ion battery pack that weighs just 80 kilograms. According to VW, this is enough for a 180-km driving range and a run from rest to 100 km/h in 10.8 seconds. The pie-in-the-sky aspect is the claim that the E-Bugster can be “refuelled” in 35 minutes at a charging station equipped with the right charger. Good luck finding that when you need it.

    Graeme Fletcher for National Post

    China also played host to the world premiere of the Nissan Sylphy.

    Nissan Sylphy

    China also played host to the world premiere of the Nissan Sylphy. Normally, it might slide by as being another of the numerous models that will not be sold in Canada. Well, the Sylphy will become the next-generation Sentra. As with the recently released Altima, the Sylphy/Sentra has been kicked up a notch or two both in terms of its style and content — it is much less entry-level this time around. Up front, a new grille and headlights that are underscored by LEDs accentuate the car’s wider stance, and the side profile of the car shows far more character than the outgoing vehicle. At the back end there are more LEDs in the tail lights. The interior also takes a big step forward, with much less hard plastic and more content, including push-button start and a smart key. A new 1.8L engine that’s married to Nissan’s next-generation Xtronic continuously variable transmission will power the Sylphy/Sentra. While there were no hard numbers released, Nissan says the combination will deliver better performance and fuel economy.

    Volvo V40

    Looking like a four-door version of the V30, the all-new V40 is an upscale hatchback that features an oversized sunroof. The interior is certainly a cut above what one expects, with soft-touch materials, watch-like gauges that present information in three distinct formats, along with two of the most comfortable front seats in the business. There is also decent rear seat legroom and 11.8 cubic feet of cargo space. No word on when or if it will come to Canada but, should it make the transatlantic crossing, it will likely arrive with a 180-hp, four-cylinder engine with direct injection and a turbocharger. The latter ensures that 177 lb-ft of torque is delivered at a low 1,600 rpm. As shown, the V40 was offered with a six-speed manual or six-speed powershift transmissions. In keeping with Volvo’s safety philosophy, it will come with everything from lane keep assist and blind spot monitoring to Volvo’s advanced pedestrian detection system.

    Graeme Fletcher for National Post

    The award for least noteworthy launch goes to Range Rover. It revealed a special edition of its popular Evoque crossover — one designed in conjunction with former Spice Girl Victoria Beckham.

    Miscellaneous

    The award for least noteworthy launch goes to Range Rover. It revealed a special edition of its popular Evoque crossover — one designed in conjunction with former Spice Girl Victoria Beckham. The bespoke finish includes 20-inch wheels, a rich leather interior and rose gold accents dotted throughout the three-door Evoque. According to Gerry McGovern, Land Rover’s director of design, “Victoria herself inspired the use of rose gold. She was wearing dark clothes and a rose gold man’s watch. Apparently, it was the contrast between a slim feminine wrist and a man’s watch that got Land Rover’s mojo going. A grand total of 200 will be available worldwide. Why bother?

    Graeme Fletcher for National Post

    Having shocked the world at the Geneva Motor Show with its take on a luxury SUV, Bentley was usurped as the purveyor of the ugliest vehicle on display in China by the Geely Emgrand GE.

    Having shocked the world at the Geneva Motor Show with its take on a luxury SUV, Bentley was usurped as the purveyor of the ugliest vehicle on display in China by the Geely Emgrand GE. To say it was battered with a really big ugly-stick is being way too polite! The bulbous nose and gigantic big mouth bass-like slatted grille are only eclipsed in the ugly department by the ungainly crest atop the hood. And, trust me, the view from the rear doesn’t get any better.


    2:00 pm on April 23, 2012
     
  • It has been quite a while since I wrote a progress report on the Bugatti Aerolithe that I have been building for several years. Despite the lengthy period, I still get regular requests to update the progress.

    Despite many readers’ concerns that the project has become moribund, it hasn’t, and, in fact, it has never even slowed down, but it has reached a difficult stage where we have been producing all the tiny bits and pieces required to build a car from scratch. Add to that the stipulation that the parts being manufactured had to replicate exactly the style and engineering of 1936 and it became extraordinarily time consuming. It also lent very little to the creation of sparkling progress reports.

    Now, I am happy to say that 95% of the parts manufacture is done. The only major fabrication remaining is finalizing the two front fenders, hood and the aprons that surround the frame and radiator. We will also need to create the hold-downs and hood hinges for these, but those are small items quickly rendered.

    The frame and driveline is complete and the engine is just having its final inspection before it is assembled for the very last time. The interior is ready to install with just the upholstering of the seats remaining. We chose pale green leather in keeping with the exterior colour of the car, which is a very silvery green. This will no doubt be contentious as common myth and misunderstanding is that the car was silver.

    Our proof for the colour we are using is a painting executed by a Bugatti engineer by the name of Bigtet in 1936. He presented the painting as a gift to Jean Bugatti, the car’s designer and heir to the Bugatti dynasty. It seems hardly likely that he would have painted the car any colour but the correct one and, in the painting, the Aerolithe is represented flying down a rural road at speed and it is most definitely light green.

    While no colour photographs exist of the car, we were fortunate to have stumbled across colour photographs of another Bugatti of the same vintage, which is identical in colour to the painting. Voila!

    The entire rear shell and rear fenders are complete and under paint. The correct tail lights were sourced in France and we had to build the mounts and sockets into the rear fenders, which sweep around the rear of the car and meet in the middle. The amazing fin that runs from the front of the car over its roof and down the long tapering tail is complete and filled with all of its rivet detail. The rivet size and distance apart were carefully scaled from the photographs and are exactly as original.

    The spoked wheels were manufactured to specification, but there is a problem with the tires. We have period-appropriate Dunlops on the car. However, when it appeared at the Paris auto show, it sported whitewall Dunlops with the Dunlop script in raised black lettering. This has been a problem. A few years ago, I had great luck with Dunlop recreating tires for another Bugatti project and it was very supportive. But, this time, despite repeated attempts, we have failed to garner any interest or even returned phone calls from the company.

    What we have recently discovered is that Dunlop may never have made wide whitewall tires, and those sported by the cars on the Bugatti stand in 1936 may have actually been painted. This makes life easier, but it will no doubt stir another hornets’ nest of controversy. (Yes, the politics of Bugatti enthusiasts are that anal.)

    I had the instruments for the car restored by a specialist in Holland, and they were wildly expensive, coming in at a cool $9,400. But they did arrive in their own custom metal briefcase with a wonderful wooden plaque with my firm’s name and commissioning date. That made me feel much better about the cost.

    The chassis of the car is absolutely original and any alterations that we had to make to it were done with the addition of a few milled blocks of machined aluminum. This was done to implement the setback for the motor. In the Aerolithe, the motor was 90 centimetres back from the usual motor mount points. We created machined aluminum blocks shaped to curve with the engine and chassis and be quite unobtrusive. Other than that, the new coachwork fits the old chassis like a glove. This is despite the widely held belief by many entrenched Bugattistes that the car had a very different frame from the original standard Type 57 Bugatti frame we have used.

    I had the body built with no reference to the frame, only to the few photographs that existed of the car, so we were all very surprised when the body fit the standard chassis with virtually no problems. In fact, if we had been mounting the coachwork on the supercharged frame that many feel was under the Aerolithe, we would have had to make quite a few alterations.

    In my innocence I told of this discovery in print both here and abroad several years ago and have been the subject of quite a bit of mail, most of it quite hateful. Most amusingly, I was accosted at Retromobile in Paris last winter and I am sure that my detractor found it quite frustrating that I really and genuinely don’t care which is right or wrong as the car I am building is not the original Aerolithe. That car most likely ended up in the smelters of wartime Europe.

    We will certainly be finished by late winter or early spring next year.  Many people have asked what will happen once it is finished. That is entirely up to the car’s long-suffering and very patient owner but, whatever its fate, I am sure it will create a stir wherever it goes and impress all who see it. Even 75% assembled, the car’s lines and details are breathtaking, and no mean-spirited criticisms or controversy will ever be able to alter that fact.


    9:00 am on December 27, 2011