c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel

Updates from April, 2012

  • Neckarsulm, Germany • Being the upstart in the German luxury sedan sweepstakes (and considering it was born out of Horch — by way of Auto Union — which can trace its roots way back to 1899, it’s hard to deem Volkswagen’s luxury arm as a parvenu), Audi tries a little harder and is a little more willing to take chances.

    That’s especially true with Europe’s luxury D-segment cars, where, truth be told, Audi’s A8 is an afterthought compared with the more established Mercedes S-Class and BMW 7 Series. Despite four generations of exquisite aluminum-chassis engineering, there’s still little following for the company’s top-of-the-line über-sedan. With nothing to lose, the good fellows from Ingolstadt are willing to experiment more than their hide-bound German competition.

    This means that some time in the not-too-distant future — even though it will be available in Europe by June — Audi will be testing the waters with a four-cylinder A8. (Cort Nielsen, Audi Canada’s public relations guru, isn’t quite sure when we’ll see it.) Yes, a $100,000 sedan with a measly four-banger.

    Oh, the Hybrid badge on the rear trunk lid adds the legitimacy of an electric motor driving the front wheels and a big graphite-cathode lithium ion battery in the trunk. Nonetheless, the new A8’s basic powerplant is still the same 2.0-litre TFSI turbo four-cylinder that can be found in all manner of downmarket Audis, not to mention a slew of even more pedestrian Volkswagens. But, such is the marketing hype of hybrid technology — and perhaps a measure of the desperation to establish the A8’s bona fides — that Audi will soon be selling a premium luxury sedan with but four pistons.

    So, the big question is, what does the environmentally conscious banker give up in his or her quest for both hedonistic luxury and fuel-sipping parsimony?

    Not too much, if my short drive around Audi’s spiritual home is any indication. With only four pistons combusting, the Hybrid boasts 245 horsepower — middling, anyway you judge it. But, sporting a turbocharger and a transmission-mounted 40-kilowatt electric motor for added thrust, there’s an almost diesel-like (more on that in a moment) 354 pound-feet of torque available as low as 1,500 rpm.

    Riding that wave of torque, there’s very little indication the Hybrid is anything other than yet another fully hedonistic luxury sedan. Even from low revs, acceleration feels muscular and, thanks to the engine’s relatively low revs and some excellent noise, vibration and harshness management from the standard active noise control system, none of the cacophony usually accompanying high-revving four-bangers intrudes on the sybaritic (of which, like in all A8s, there is much) experience.

    The combination of the 2.0 TFSI and electric motor is all but indistinguishable, then, from the comportment of the conventional 3.0L V6-powered A8 we’ll soon see in Canada. Only at the upper reaches of its rev band (and exactly what rpm I am referring to is a mystery as Audi has replaced the traditional tachometer with a more hybrid-oriented “% power” meter) does the diminutive powertrain feel strained, and only when asking for more maximum warp speed.

    Still, you can occasionally feels a few vibrations through the gas pedal, when the eight-speed automatic transmission — obviously calibrated for fuel economy — tries to keep its torque converter locked when accelerating at low revs (usually during a mild passing manoeuvre). Then, the combination of high load and low rpm sends a little four-cylinder tingle through the driveline. It’s a minor thing, something even the princess-and-the-pea might miss were she not in her hyper-critical autojournalist mode.

    However, there are some compromises if you want an A8 to achieve the same 8.6 litres per 100 kilometres I averaged during my 200-kilometre stint in the Hybrid. The first is that the quattro all-wheel-drive system for which Audi is justifiably famous is not available with the hybrid powertrain. So, A8 owners looking to conquer our snow-covered north should look elsewhere. Also, although the 1.3-kWh lithium ion battery (good for three kilometres of electric-only motoring, if you have a delicate throttle foot and the patience of Job) weighs only 38 kilograms, it takes up quite a bit of space in the trunk, with a pronounced hump precluding the loading of a full-sized Ping golf bag.

    Part of its girth is a nifty cooling system that force-feeds the batteries atmospheric air as well as some from the air conditioning system to ensure all those lithium ions never exceed 42C.

    Lastly, the A8, like all hybrids, uses regenerative braking — essentially reversing the polarity of the electric motor — to recharge the battery while stop-and-going around town. This electrical retardation can be a little over-sensitive when braking at slow speeds. No matter how gingerly the brake pedal is massaged, there’s a little jolt as the electric brakes kick in. It’s not apparent at high speeds and most owners should quickly acclimatize, but other automakers with more experience with hybrids — Toyota, for instance — have managed to attenuate the problem.

    Though interesting from both a technological and performance point of view, I’m most fascinated with the A8 Hybrid as social commentary. You see, while the hybrid posts stellar numbers — it averages 6.3 L/100 km in the European cycle and emits only 147 grams of carbon dioxide for every kilometre — Audi Canada will soon begin importing the 3.0L turbodiesel version of the A8 for approximately the same price (about $90,000 if the European price is any indication). And, yes, its fuel consumption/emissions numbers are about the same. The TDI emits slightly more CO2 — 158 grams per km — but is slightly more frugal, consuming just six litres of putrefied dinosaur juice every 100 klicks.

    Just to confuse things further, there’s a high-performance, 247-hp 3.0L TDI that gets 6.4 L/100 km and emits 169 g/km. So, to reiterate, Audi has three A8s with combined fuel economy in the sixes — 6.6, 6.3 and 6.0 — with the Hybrid flanked by the two diesel versions.

    Which will be the more popular — the media darling (that would be the Hybrid in case you’re wondering), or the more traditional but more publicity-challenged diesel? It’s the first time, at least in Canada, that diesel and hybrid powertrains have competed for prominence in virtually identical automobiles. I await your decision.


    8:00 am on April 4, 2012
     
  • Sebring, Fla. • History will record that Audi won the 60th anniversary of the 12 Hours of Sebring endurance race, counting as the first event of the new FIA World Endurance Racing Championship (WEC). Tom Kristensen, Dindo Capello and Allan McNish literally steamrolled the competition and scored a 10th win for the German automaker in convincing fashion at the Florida race track, with a four-lap lead over their teammates Timo Bernhard, Romain Dumas and Loïc Duval, also running an R18 TDI.

    For the veteran drivers, victory was sweet as Kristensen recorded a sixth career win at Sebring, while Capello scored his fifth win and McNish his fourth win at the Florida event, which is known as the prelude to the crown jewel of endurance racing, the famed 24 Hours of Le Mans. With Peugeot having pulled out of endurance racing and Toyota not quite ready to enter the fray, Audi simply was the class of the field.

    A whispering giant is the best way to describe the R18 TDI race car as its turbo-diesel engine is incredibly silent, even as the car rushes past at more than 322 kilometres an hour. In fact, it’s so eerily quiet that a sort of cognitive dissonance occurs within you as you watch the car streak by and you realize that you hear the sound of air rushing around the car and the tires rolling on the ground more than the exhaust note of the turbocharged 510-horsepower diesel V6.

    Before the race, five-time Le Mans winner and Audi brand ambassador Emanuele Pirro described running an Audi prototype at Sebring: “As a driver, you can really enjoy the first five minutes of the 12 Hours of Sebring because you are running up front at speed by yourself. After the first five minutes, you realize that what is ahead of you is 11 hours and 55 minutes of overtaking slower cars …”

    With 63 cars competing in both the WEC and the ALMS (American Le Mans Series) at Sebring this year, traffic was indeed a problem for the drivers of the faster prototypes as they came up on cars such as the Chevrolet Corvettes, Porsche GT3s and Ferrari 458 Italias from the GT categories. Staying out of trouble and keeping the lead was the challenge awaiting the Audi squad.

    According to race winner Allan McNish: “The car was running well, but traffic was a real challenge and the temperatures around noon — when I was sitting in the cockpit for a long time — were pretty high. It was tough clinching victory here.

    “Everyone on the team and at home at Audi can be proud of this. It’s great that we won the anniversary race and the WEC opener here. But we’re already looking forward to the next race when we’ll have something in our hands that production development will benefit from yet again as well — a hybrid vehicle.”

    That hybrid vehicle is the R18 e-tron quattro, which was not entered in the 12-hour race. But it was tested at Sebring during the week following the event in preparation for its debut in the second round of the WEC, which will be held at Spa-Francorchamps in Belgium May 5. Two R18 e-tron quattro race cars will also be entered at the 24 Hours of Le Mans alongside two R18 TDI Ultras, so named because Audi will pare down the weight of the “conventional” race cars for the famed endurance classic.

    The R18 e-tron quattro features what Audi calls its next-generation all-wheel-drive technology, where the rear wheels are powered by the internal-combustion engine and the front wheels by electric power. Here’s how it works: Under braking, kinetic energy is recovered on the front axle and is fed into an electric flywheel accumulator before being retrieved under acceleration. The electric drive — acting on the front wheels alone — and the conventional power delivered to the rear wheels by the turbocharged V6 means the two systems will complement one another in a new form of all-wheel-drive technology, which Audi is keen to develop with an eye to series production in the future.

    Audi will not be the only manufacturer to race a hybrid at Le Mans this year, as Toyota makes a return to endurance racing with its new TS030 gasoline-hybrid race car. Nissan will also be fielding a very unconventional race car called the DeltaWing, which will be powered by a small 1.6-litre 300-hp four-cylinder engine.

    The 24 Hours of Le Mans will once again be the race to watch as major manufacturers attempt to break new ground in endurance racing.


    1:00 pm on March 20, 2012
     
  • By Scott Deveau

    The State of California has announced plans to offer owners of a new low-emissions Chevrolet Volt an additional $1,500 tax credit on top of the $7,500 rebate already given to those who buy the electric vehicle.

    The cherry on top? State lawmakers also decided to let owners of the new Volt drive it solo in California’s carpool lanes.

    It was just the latest example of how governments across North America have been pushing consumers towards electric and hybrid vehicles and off fossil fuels.

    But to little effect.

    In Canada last year, hybrid and electric vehicles amounted to just 1.5% of the total vehicles sold in the country with sales weighed down by consumer anxiety around the technology and price. A recent KPMG study forecast that electrified vehicles were unlikely to make up more than 15% of the overall market in North American until at least 2025.

    This has automakers searching for more consumer-friendly alternatives as they struggle to meet the increasingly stringent efficiency standards set in the U.S. and elsewhere.

    Oddly enough, that has brought companies such as electricity boosters General Motors Co. back to diesels in their efforts to curb emissions. GM announced earlier this week it would be bringing a diesel variation of its popular compact car, the Cruze, to North America next year. It is perhaps the best example that diesel is about the enter the mainstream on this continent.

    “It’s all centred around fuel economy,” says Matt Crossley, GM Canada director of engineering. “Hybridization and electrification is part of it. Diesel is part of it. There’s probably going to be other fuels in here, like natural gas, that are likely going to be a part of it.”

    Diesel engines have, however, presented themselves as one of the more proven technologies in the marketplace. They have long made up nearly half of the market in Europe and elsewhere.

    But their legacy of being loud, suphur-spewing beasts clogging North American highways has been something that has weighed on sales here. As a result, the market for diesel engines in North America has been primarily reserved for trucks because of their better torque, and to European imports.

    But major technological advancements over the past few decades, as well as new regulations on the fuel that fires them here, has breathed new life in the diesel market in North America.

    “The modern diesels are just fabulous engines,” says David Cole of the Center for Automotive Research. “A lot of the historic problems of noise and smell are pretty much gone, and diesel fuel is more widely available.”

    The value proposition is clear: Diesel engines offer similar fuel savings to hybrids at a lower cost and without the anxiety attached to a new technology. As Sergio Marchionne, Chrysler chief executive, put it at the Detroit Auto Show this year: “We think that the market is ready to listen to a diesel story.”

    Chrysler will also be bringing a diesel version of its Grand Cherokee to market in the second quarter of 2013.

    It’s not just the U.S. automakers joining the party.

    Read the full story here.


    10:31 am on February 27, 2012
     
  • You’re a snowbird. If you’re an East Coaster, the destination is Florida. If you’re on the Wrong Coast, it’s probably California. Both are more than 2,500 kilometres away, you have the kids to accommodate, not to mention the significant other’s collection of shoes/scuba gear/really ugly sunglasses. In other words, you need room, comfort and, being the son of Depression-era parents, you’d prefer some co-operation in the fuel economy department.

    The question, then, is what to drive?

    Of course, one could do the no-brainer and just opt for a minivan: a Honda Odyssey if you’re bucks up, a Dodge Grand Caravan if you’re cheap. Certainly, either would provide the room and comfort part of the equation, though neither will be skipping many stops at the fuel bar. I suppose you could try to pack everyone into a Hyundai Sonata Hybrid, but, while that would fix the fuel consumption issue, man, oh man you would not be on speaking terms with anyone in your family for, oh, the next three years.

    For family harmony and fuel economy (depending on the circumstances), may I suggest Audi’s Q7 TDI. Yes, I know that, at $68,500, it’s a wallet-lightener, but it is a highway cruiser nonpareil. Indeed, this may be one of the best vehicles ever designed for serious long-haul roadwork.

    A word of warning: Shopping the new, supposedly superior Internet way won’t reveal the Q7’s real-world abilities. Indeed, some of its stats are underwhelming. The Q7’s turbodiesel V6, for instance, displaces but three measly litres, hardly the stuff to get excited about. Heck, the Odyssey’s V6 packs another half litre of gasoline-fuelled displacement. The Q7’s maximum hp is but 225, barely more than the aforementioned Sonata Hybrid’s — hardly a model of swiftness and speed at 1,000 kilograms lighter and substantially less than the turbo version of the same car. Dave’s starting to sound full of it, isn’t he?

    On the other hand, there is 406 pound-feet of torque on hand, available as low as 1,750 rpm. Then there’s Transport Canada’s fuel economy rating of 7.7 litres per 100 kilometres on the highway, not quite Prius-like but amazing for a ginormous seven-passenger SUV that weighs almost 2,500 kg and can tow 3,000 kilos (just in case, in a trying-to-sell-ice-cubes-to-Eskimos moment, you’re thinking of hauling a boat all the way down to Florida).

    THE SPECS

    Type of vehicle All-wheel-drive full-sized SUV
    Engine 3.0L DOHC V6 turbodiesel
    Power 225 hp @ 3,750 rpm; 406 lb-ft of torque @ 1,750 rpm
    Transmission Eight-speed manumatic
    Brakes Four-wheel disc with ABS
    Tires P265/50R19
    Price: base/as tested $68,500/$80,450
    Destination charge $1,995
    Transport Canada fuel economy L/100 km 12.3 city, 7.7 hwy.

    Off the spec sheet, the story gets even better. On my cruise-controlled-to-120-kilometres-an-hour trip from Toronto to Ottawa, the Q7 averaged but 8.2 L/100 km. That’s barely above the Transport Canada rating at a substantially higher speed. As I have said many times, diesels come closer than any other powertrain to matching our government’s normally optimistic ratings. Even throttling up to 130 km/h for the return trip only saw fuel consumption increase to 8.9 L/100 km.

    Nor is that parsimony muted by meagre performance. Despite its paucity of horsepower, the 3.0-litre turbodiesel is more than a willing performer. Very willing. Jump off the line and passing cars on the highway is almost equal to doing it in a supercharged Range Rover. Oh, sure, once a 500-hp Range Rover gets up a head of steam, it will leave the Q7 in its wake, but cruising along at a buck-twenty-five and then passing a long semi was a doddle for the oil-burning Q7. Indeed, too often for my licence’s sake, I continually found myself looking down at the speedo to see that the big Audi had crept perilously close to a [former OPP commissioner Julian] Fantino-enraging 150 klicks and I had to back off lest I and my truckload of Christmas presents be persecuted, er, that’s prosecuted, for so-called “street racing.” Audi says the Q7 takes 8.7 seconds to accelerate to 100 km/h; it feels waaay quicker than that. I find that rather mediocre rating one of the most deceiving specifications I’ve ever run across.

    Of course, part of the Q7’s stealth-like speed can be attributed to the turbodiesel’s sophistication. This is on a TDI that is not “smooth for a diesel” or “almost as good as a gasoline engine.” My son was driving the Audi for more than two hours before gleaning — through an off-hand comment — that the Q7 was powered by bunker crude; a good thing because, moments later, he was in charge of fuelling the big beast.

    And that brings up one of two possible drawbacks to diesel ownership. Simply put, it’s a crapshoot as to how clean your fuel pump will be. Unlike fuelling a gasoline-burning engine, there’s a little sliminess involved in filling up a diesel. Real men won’t be bothered but Herself and metrosexuals (and, Lord, when did I become one of them?) will want to be wearing gloves lest their pampered skin become smelly.

    At least we won’t have to be refuelling often. The Q7’s range was never less than an eat-your-heart-out-Nissan-Leaf 800 klicks and, had I chosen to maintain our absurdly low speed limits, I could have probably made it back and forth from Ottawa on a single (100-litre) tank of fuel with just enough diesel left over for the ritual returning of unwelcomed gifts.

    On the downside, the Q7 averaged about 14 L/100 km in the city, not truly terrible but not really much better than a garden-variety large SUV and certainly more than a hybrid powertrain would probably achieve in the same-sized vehicle. Indeed, the deep divide between the Q7’s exemplary rural fuel mileage and its mediocre city consumption (and, of course, just the opposite for hybrids) just reinforces my opinion that the optimal powertrain for overall reduction is a hybridized diesel.

    As for the rest of the Q7, it should come as no surprise that the Audi handles better than the average two-and-a-half-ton sport-utility vehicle. Yes, the suspension is stiffer than the aforementioned pillow-like Range Rover, but it is nonetheless quite expert at isolating the interior from the frost heaves (again, remember those soon-to-be-returned Christmas prizes).

    There’s also a fair amount of room available, albeit when you’re using it as a five-passenger-and-luggage wagon. Try to fit seven inside the Audi and both the third row legroom and the remaining cargo capacity gets a little tight. One criticism I have heard levelled at the Q7 is that it should either grow a couple of inches if it’s going to remain a seven-passenger vehicle or else lose the rear seats and chop a couple of inches off the wheelbase for lighter weight and superior manoeuvrability.

    The Q7’s interior is typical Audi fare, that is to say exquisitely accoutred and ever so slightly complicated. The leather is exquisite and nobody does panel gaps like Audi, but the MMI computer can be a bother and the multi-function air conditioning buttons frustrated a few first-timers. That said, they’re easily manipulated once you get used to them.

    The only place the Q7 turbodiesel doesn’t  excel — at least compared with its direct competition — is in the aforementioned urban fuel economy department. In almost all other ways — especially the room, comfort and highway fuel economy prerequisites I mentioned at the beginning of the test — it offers exceptional performance. That makes it a top-notch kilometre eater. Maybe Audi can add an electric motor to shore up its urban performance.


    9:00 am on January 5, 2012
     
  • Oh, the conflict that bubbled up when I first got behind the wheel of the new Volkswagen Passat. The very first thought upon walking up to it — and confirmed after sitting in it — was “the fools have gone and Americanized it.” And I wasn’t referring to the fact the car is now being manufactured in Chattanooga, Tenn. No, this sedan, once a favourite of mine for its Audi-like road manners without the Audi price (although, sometimes, a little too close to its upscale sibling for my liking) has been redesigned, upsized and dumbed down for the North American market — specifically, North American roads and North American-sized butts.

    Frankly, I was working up a hate-on for this car, featuring “the new look of Volkswagen.” The only saving grace was the 2.0-litre turbodiesel four-cylinder under its hood, easily the best engine of the 2012 Passat’s three-motor lineup (a 2.5L gasoline five-cylinder and  a 3.6L V6 being the others).

    Then I took a deep breath. Look at it from Volkswagen’s point of view, I said to myself. Like every other automaker, it wants to increase its market share, especially in the United States, where previous Passat models haven’t exactly set the world afire — too small and too expensive. If the masses want bigger, simpler and more generic, then that’s what it’s going to get — with a few unique VW touches thrown in.

    And the best touch is the 140-horsepower turbodiesel four. It’s always been a paragon of fuel efficiency; it now adds a quiet and a smoothness that enhances the new Passat’s driving pleasure — perhaps a little too much. On at least a couple of instances, I found myself cruising at what I thought was regular highway speeds (110 to 120 kilometres an hour depending on traffic and road conditions) only to glance at the speedometer and see in excess of 130 on the clock. Yes, the engine is that unobtrusive.

    It also has enough oomph to it when required for passing situations, thanks to its 236 pound-feet of torque, which is available from a low 1,750 rpm. Oh, the hard numbers aren’t that impressive — 10 seconds to accelerate to 100 kilometres an hour and 7.4 seconds to get from 80 to 120 km/h — but the car, which weighs a solid enough 1,541 kilograms, feels quicker.

    THE SPECS

    Type of vehicle: Front-wheel-drive family sedan
    Engine: 2.0L DOHC four-cylinder turbodiesel
    Power: 140 hp @ 4,000 rpm; 236 lb-ft of torque @ 1,750 rpm
    Transmission: Six-speed manumatic
    Brakes: Four-wheel disc with ABS
    Tires: P215/60R16
    Price: base/as tested: $28,875/same
    Destination charge: $1,365
    Transport Canada fuel economy L/100 km: 6.9 city, 4.9 hwy.

    As for fuel economy, I averaged seven litres per 100 kilometres in an even mix of suburban commuting and in-town traffic. For those who place fuel economy high on the car shopping list, remember that the diesel engine is most efficient on the highway, not in stop-and-go — the opposite of hybrids. At 120 km/h, the four-cylinder is turning over at a lazy 2,100 rpm.

    The optional six-speed automatic is well suited to the engine, shifting cleanly and taking full advantage of the engine’s grunt. It also comes with a manumatic mode, operated through the centre console-mounted shift lever. Given the torque-rich nature of the turbodiesel, I can’t fathom why someone would feel the need to self-shift, but the option is there. The one annoying feature of the tranny is that there is no detent for Drive, allowing the shifter to slide into sport mode if one is not paying attention. (That would be me — once.)

    The new Passat has lost some of its handling edge, although it hasn’t turned into a barge by any means. Steering feel remains sharp and it doesn’t wallow in harder turns such as highway on-ramps. There is some lean, though, and the ride is far more compliant. The only element I actively disliked was the mushy brakes — too much pedal travel before they grabbed, and then they grabbed hard.

    Not that the previous Passat was the epitome of style, but it at least had a familial connection to the rest of the Volkswagen lineup. The new version, however, has a generic anonymity to it that blends in with the crowd, especially when viewed in profile. The sedan could easily pass for a Ford, GM or Honda four-door. The horizontal lines in the sheetmetal emphasize the Passat’s length, which, at 4,868 millimetres, is 88 mm longer than its predecessor. The upside of the increased dimension is a cabin that will fit five adults without complaint, not to mention allowing for a cavernous 15.9 cubic-foot trunk.

    While on the subject, the cabin layout shows the same restraint as the exterior design. Unlike the high-tech layout of Hyundai’s Sonata, the Passat displays a conservatism that is likely to excite few while offending none. There’s a lot of dark plastic, but it’s the soft-touch kind and displays a nice grained texture. The instrument panel is wide and uncluttered, the controls are logically placed and the cloth seats are comfortable and, since the tester was the Trendline+ trim level, heated as well. However, considering the tester was also $28,875, the fact that the seats are manually adjustable and not powered strikes me as a poor decision on the part of the planners.

    I’d be lying if I said I was blown away by the new Passat. It’s good, but it has lost a good deal of its predecessor’s personality. Still, after driving it for a week, it obviously makes a far better family sedan than the previous models ever did and will definitely add more to VW’s corporate coffers.

    Equally, the TDI version is a must for those wanting superior fuel economy. Diesel technology might not be as sexy or as eco-friendly as hybrid powertrains, but one cannot fault its frugality. In Volkswagen’s Passat, it comes close to brilliant.


    2:00 pm on December 26, 2011
     
  • There is something unusually dissonant in the land of harmony and quietude, a low rumble that initially intrudes, then blends into the sea of traffic sounds or disappears altogether with the playing of music, only making its presence again obtrusive when passing power is called for.

    That discord is the initial engagement of the 3.5-litre V6 turbodiesel residing under the hood of Mercedes’ E 350 BlueTec, said E-Class an otherwise inspired blend of all things smooth, luxurious, safe and serene. By the measure of other diesels, the BlueTec is by no means overtly loud or displeasing. It is a highly sophisticated unit that is both clean running and exceedingly fuel-efficient. Compared with the silky silence of the gasoline V6 that I’ve sampled in numerous other Mercedes vehicles, however, the BlueTec is gruffer. It quickly settles into its rhythm, though, and easily disappears into the subconscious — only to reappear when it comes time to fill up at the pumps.

    Maybe I’m just inserting my working-class sensibilities into what is assuredly an upper crust car but, for me, the BlueTec’s superior fuel economy easily outweighs its thrum. A week-long test average of 8.4 litres per 100 kilometres for a mid-sized luxury sedan that weighs 1,845 kilograms is more than fair trade, especially when the bulk of my driving was suburban commuting, not long highway runs. In fact, it quickly became my favourite version of E-Class, replacing the E 350 gas — despite giving up 58 horsepower to that model. At 7.8 seconds to reach 100 kilometres an hour, the 210-hp BlueTec is only 0.6 seconds slower (credit 400 pound-feet of torque at a low 1,600 rpm). Meanwhile, Transport Canada rates the BlueTec at 9.7 L/100 km in the city and 6.1 in the highway — the E 350 gas is rated at 12.7 L/100 km in the city and 8.3 on the highway.

    THE SPECS

    Type of vehicle Rear-wheel-drive luxury sedan
    Engine 3.5L DOHC V6 turbodiesel
    Power 210 hp @ 3,400 rpm; 400 lb-ft of torque @ 1,600 rpm
    Transmission Seven-speed manumatic
    Brakes Four-wheel disc with ABS
    Tires P245/40R18
    Price: base/as tested $62,250/$68,680 (2011)
    Destination charge $1,995
    Transport Canada fuel economy L/100 km 9.7 city, 6.1 hwy.

    Considering there’s also a $700 credit between the two 2012 models — $62,700 for the BlueTec, $63,400 for the gas — that’s cash I would pocket in a heartbeat. Other than the price of diesel, which, at the time, was 10 cents higher than regular unleaded, the only negative — though it is fairly significant — is that the E 350 gas comes standard with 4Matic all-wheel drive while the BlueTec is rear-drive only. C’mon Mercedes, this is Canada. Give the E 350 BlueTec the drivetrain it needs and I’ll never look at another high-end sport-ute again!

    Seriously, taking into account the E-Class is more of a boulevardier than an outright sport sedan, its ride and handling aspects are impeccable. The 7G-Tronic automatic knocks off upshifts and downshifts with flawless precision. The steering has a muscular heft to it without being artificial. And one can thank Mercedes’ engineers for the standard Direct Control suspension and select damping setup, which provide a blend of firmness and comfort without going overboard in either department.

    What truly seals the deal with the E 350 is its interior environment, a veritable oasis of comfort and entertainment that kicks stress to the curb and soothes the nerves of frazzled drivers. There’s a full measure of the modern conveniences one would expect from the tri-star brand, including (now that winter is approaching) heated front seats and steering wheel. The Comand controller that operates the audio/visual and communication interfaces is reasonably intuitive. But, what is especially worthy of praise is the instrument cluster, featuring gauges that are clear, sharp and well lit, plus the navigation display, which has to be the easiest to read of any car I have driven in recent memory. The rest of the controls are large, properly marked and fall easily to hand. Finally, the cabin’s sound deadening allows just a hint of the outside world to intrude so as not to seal the occupants in tomb-like silence. The one nit to pick was the audio system’s front speakers, which sounded tinny when I was listening to a news station. This isn’t the first time I’ve complained about the speakers in Mercedes cars, so I expect that the company’s sound engineers are half deaf from all those years of cranking Pink Floyd to 11.

    Mercedes gives up nothing in the safety department, with a long list of devices and backups all designed to keep the car’s occupants safe and the sheetmetal from getting pranged up. Along with the usual assortment of standard safety nannies is Attention Assist, which monitors and evaluates more than 70 different parameters in order to recognize driver drowsiness and provide warning if it detects the driver is nodding off. One option worth considering, especially long-distance drivers, is the $800 Driving Assistance Package.  This includes blind-spot monitoring and Passive Lane Keeping Assist. While the former is self-explanatory, the latter sends a pulse through the steering wheel when sensors detect the car is drifting into another lane. For those who might think that annoying, it can be switched off.

    Although the tester was a 2011 model, there are no mechanical changes to the E 350 BlueTec for 2012, and the cosmetic differences are minor. Plus, the price increase is only $450.

    A dozen years ago, the idea of finding any diesel-powered car desirable would have been laughable. However, the BlueTec engine is just too good to ignore, offering plenty of grunt when needed along with the tangible benefit of compact car-like fuel economy. Also, with the amount of traffic congestion these days, the more comfortable and comforting aspects of fine driving are taking greater precedence over absolute performance.

    The E-Class sedan, no matter what engine resides under its hood, is my definition of attainable desirability.


    11:00 am on December 2, 2011