c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel

Updates from May, 2012

  • BARCELONA, SPAIN — Honda — at least compared with other Japanese motorcycle manufacturers — does things differently. While cranking out scads of ubiquitous, commercially viable sporting four-cylinder sportbikes and boulevard-cruising V-twins, the world’s most prolific motorcycle manufacturer has shown an occasional propensity for the weird and wonderful. What else would you call the once-much-hyped, now-best-forgotten Pacific Coast, a fully scooterized tourer based on a whimpy V-twin cruiser?

    Some have been successful; the Rune proved, if nothing else, that someone other than Harley could produce an over-the-top road brute. Some were way ahead of their time; in the case of the Honda 750A automatic, way, way ahead of their time. And some have been so comical that one just had to assume they were the result of some terribly twisted corporate sense of humour; Honda didn’t really think the DN-01 would sell, did it?

    Honda is also willing to go into the belly of the beast. Here we are, for instance, in motorcycling-mad Spain with some of the most aggressive riders in the world and Honda is introducing its new novice-minded, fuel economy-conscious NC (as in New Concept; Honda likes these grand themes) 700, a twin-cylinder 670-cubic-centimetre runabout completely lacking in the one attribute — mega doses of horsepower — that has traditionally been used to lure youth to motorcycling. Indeed, we might as well get this out of the way right off the bat: If you’re looking for scads of horsepower, look elsewhere. Honda is not publishing power figures for the new NC700, but there are probably about 50 or 60 ponies available at the rear wheel. That’s hardly the stuff to strike fear into the hearts of R6 owners. Perhaps more oddly — at least for experienced motorcyclists — is that Honda shuts the party down at a 6,400-rpm redline, the rev limiter kicking in abruptly. For the seasoned motojournalist, it takes some acclimatization.

    But there is method to Honda’s madness. For instance, here in Spain, where there are 2.5 million registered motorcycles over 125 cc, there’s a huge market for well-executed, pragmatic two-wheeled transportation. And, here, the NC700 delivers. Available in both standard — NC700S — and adventure touring — NC700X — guises, Honda claims that either one gets about the same fuel economy — 80 miles per gallon or approximately 2.9 litres per 100 kilometres — as the far less powerful single-lung CBR250R. Indeed, if the NC700’s gas gauge and speedometer are to be believed, one should get almost 400 km to the tankful, an incredible range considering there are only 14 litres on board.

    Everything about the NC700 is geared toward maximizing torque and minimizing fuel consumption. The powerband ranges from 3,000 to just 6,000 rpm, incredibly low-revving for such a small engine. Cam timing — and in a twist each of the two cylinders has different inlet timing to help the parallel twin engine emulate a V-twin’s rumpa-rumpa — is modest and the bore and stroke ratio is undersquare (the piston’s diameter is smaller than its stroke). Gearing is also as tall as some big-inch Harley Twins. Indeed, 3,000 rpm in top gear equates to 100 km an hour, so the engine is fairly loafing. Again, it’s all in the name of fuel economy.

    And, in most cases, it’s not overly detrimental to performance. We spent the day playing silly buggers on serpentine Spanish roads. Once I got used to short-shifting the NC long before it approached 6,000 rpm, I never noticed any power deficit. That said, those seeking to cruise the highways and byways at a buck-forty and still have power in reserve will find the top-end power reserved. Like an old BMW airhead R100, the power is adequate, not excessive.

    The rest of the NC700 is fairly conventional. Both the S and the X share engine, transmission, frame, wheels and brakes. The suspension travel, however, is longer for the adventure touring-themed X and, consequently, it rides higher and is slightly longer. It’s amazing how such seemingly minuscule changes make a large difference in comportment. The S fairly slices toward apexes if you so much as  look at them, while the X is a little lazier about changing direction. If all you want to do is commute and roil along twisty roads, then the S is the better choice.

    I’d have the X, though. The taller seat sees it offer a plusher, roomier seating position. The handlebar is taller for a more comfortable, upright seating position and the windscreen, such as it is, provides better wind protection. I’d be searching the aftermarket for an even wider windshield, however, were I thinking of taking the NC700X for longer tours. It is up to the task, however, especially since Honda Canada will be offering a full complement of luggage and ABS is standard on both models.

    Pricing hasn’t been set, but Honda says it will start below $9,000. Pricing is going to prove very important to the NC700’s success, I suspect. Competitors, such as Suzuki’s DL650, offer more performance and features. Anyone swayed by the NC700’s frugality will likely also be price conscious. Pricing aside, the NC700 will make an ideal trade-up for Honda’s legion CBR125 and CBR250 loyalists. And, unlike some other Asian brands, Honda is to be lauded: Breaking the status quo is seldom welcomed, even when it’s absolutely necessary.


    1:00 pm on May 18, 2012
     
  • SOUTH BEACH, FLA. It’s not all that easy mating “slim” and “fat boy” in the same reference and making even some semblance of sense. That’s why Harley-Davidson was particularly laconic (its monikers usually run to the Electra Glide Ultra Limited) in the naming of its latest Softail, the Slim, even though, as incongruous as it may seem, the Slim most closely resembles The Motor Company’s Fat Boy. Indeed, even Harley’s all-powerful and ever vigilant public relations department could not completely avoid the dissonance, the fact that the Slim is fuelled from a Fat Bob tank just another example of conflicting metaphors.

    Discordant descriptors aside, what Harley wants the Slim to accomplish is to “once again make the engine the design focal point of a motorcycle.” At least so says senior designer Casey Ketterhagen. So the company slimmed down the rear tire, chopped the fenders and even left a gap between the nose of the seat and that Fat Bob gas tank. “I like to be able to look down and see what’s moving me,” says Ketterhagen. No matter what the words, though, it’s a Fat Boy on a Weight Watchers program.

    However, even to this jaundiced eye, the Slim does look relatively lithe compared with its confreres. That it is still really a fat bastard — it weighs in, like many cruisers and most Harleys, at more than 300 kilograms — doesn’t diminish the fact that it looks svelte (and as any woman will attest, Billy Crystal’s Fernando Lamas was right when he stated that it’s more important to look slim than to actually be) and, thanks to an incredibly low seat height, the Slim is actually easy to ride. With just 604 millimetres separating the rider’s gluteus maximus from the tarmac, even the shortest of inseam can plant a solid riding boot on terra firma, making low-speed handling a doddle.

    At the same time, the Slim is a full Big Twin Harley and not a small-motored Sportster. That means 103 cubic inches of Big Twin (previous iterations of the Big Twin have displaced 88 and 98 cubic inches) pumping out just a smidgen less than 100 pound-feet of torque at barely 3,000 rpm. It might be overstating the obvious, but riding a Softail Slim is about as far away as one can get from piloting a Yamaha R6, especially since The Motor Company actually reduced ground clearance to get the desired low profile.

    It all works, though. The narrower tires actually make the Slim, like every other fatty that’s ever lost weight, lighter on its feet. Combined with the wide “Hollywood” (and I have no idea why it’s labelled as such) handlebar, it made wheeling the Slim even around the tight confines of South Beach effortless. On the other hand, the stretched 1,635-millimetre wheelbase and whopping 147 mm of trail (abut 50% more than that aforementioned Yamaha) make the Slim incredibly stable on the highway.

    Like most Harleys, the Slim has but one singular disc brake up front. At least it has a four-piston caliper and, if you opt for the optional Security Package (which also has a new, higher-grade anti-theft device), you get Harley’s novel anti-lock braking system. Not only does it prevent wheel lockup during panic braking, but, because the engineers hid the wheel sensors and their slotted discs in the wheel hubs, Harley’s stylistic pretensions aren’t marred (once again conforming to Billy Crystal’s better-to-look-good-than-feel-good theorem).
    All is not perfect, however; especially to those approaching six feet tall who might just happen to have wonky backs. That low, low seat — so important to short-stuffs riding around town — combined with the feet-forward floorboards and the relatively low Hollywood handlebar had me bent over the Slim like I was in a hurry to make my chiropractor rich. The riding position isn’t as  exaggerated as that of the company’s V-Rods, but those seriously attracted to the Slim are best advised to make sure their lower lumbars are up to the task.

    Other than L3:L4 issues, however, the Slim is comfortable, the seat and the Softail’s unique suspension both surprisingly accommodating. Vibration, despite the fact that the Softail eschews the Big Twin engine’s normal rubber mounting system (there is a quake-quelling counterbalance shaft, however), is minimal.

    In the end, the Slim will probably be judged as yet another Harley-Davidson styling triumph, only marred in this case with a slightly uncomfortable riding position. But that has never stopped anyone from buying any Motor Company product. As Crystal might say, “You always look marvellous” riding a Harley.


    8:00 am on May 18, 2012
     
  • It’s inevitable really. Take six guys, any six guys, give them each a motorcycle and, well, sooner or later, a race will ensue. Actually, any number greater than one is enough to initiate the trash talking. Truth be told, if we’re alone, we’ll just race ourselves.

    It doesn’t matter if we’re old or young, rich or poor, experienced riders or complete newbies; we could even be the imminently responsible motorcycle journalists (he says, his keyboard fairly dripping sarcasm) Honda Canada has brought to its Spanish NC700 launch. The equation always remains the same: Men plus motorcycles equals race.

    We’ll race for millions. We’ll race for peanuts. Heck, we’ll race for dibs on the post-race porta-potty. Our demented need for speed requires no financial incentive. Indeed, our greatest reward is the — either spoken or unspoken but always understood — “I whipped your ass.”

    We’ll race sport bikes. We’ll race dirt bikes. As much as we revile those awkward Can-Am Spyders, chances are we’ll race those, too. Scooters are not safe in our hands and pretty much every red-blooded male I know has drunkenly raced his kid’s tricycle and has the scars to prove it (OK, that might be just me).

    The point I’m trying to make, of course, is that testosterone and speed are two ingredients essential to most males’ psyche. So, flaunting an entire passel of dirt bikes (even if they are little CRF100F minibikes) and what looks like a miniature oval dirt track at a group of ego-driven motojournalists is the proverbial red flag in the bull’s face; inevitably, there will be much charging to and fro. One just hopes it can be contained within the arena.

    The only problem is that we’re at a riding school and, as anyone familiar with instructional colleges knows, there is nothing as earnest as a motorcycle riding instructor. Fun is not on the curriculum of any rider training school I’ve ever attended, so I shouldn’t be expecting any here either.

    But this is Spain and even a short ride through Barcelona reveals a joi de vivre — at least on wheels — that belies the dire economic news dominating the Iberian peninsula. Indeed, we are told that hooning around on the little off-roaders is actually part of today’s instruction. It could all just be a desperate ploy to keep we ADD-ed moto-scribes from wandering off to chat up Spanish señoritas (again, that could be just me), but, whatever the case, we six cynical Canadian “experts” agree to a full day’s instruction, the play bikes our reward for the tedium surely to ensue.

    Damned if we didn’t all learn something.

    Honda Spain’s Safety Institute is unlike anything we have here in the Great White Frozen North. For one thing, it is owned, funded and run by the local Honda distributor. And, while Honda Canada is imminently supportive of private training facilities (donating scads of bikes to approved facilities) and runs the self-funded Junior Red Riders facility, having the entire program run corporately has advantages. The instructors are full-time employees and the selection of available bikes is incredible (from mini- to super-bikes and scads of scooters in between). And, since it’s in Mediterranean Spain, the school runs 11 months of the year; hence why, in its 20 years of operation, it’s trained 174,000 newbies, young and old alike.

    What this means is that the school has the curriculum down pat, even for know-it-all, been-riding-for-30-years motojournalists. Indeed, besides the aforementioned motocross track, there’s a fairly complex pavement course, a tricky trials section and a low-mu (that’s me wanting to sound learned when all I had to say was slippery) wet section to demonstrate the wonders of anti-lock brakes on motorcycles. Even those who claimed not to have learned anything new admitted that the refresher course was a great way to greet the spring after a winter’s worth of motorcycle-riding rustiness.

    By far the most edifying experience was riding the outrigger-equipped CBF600 and SH125 scooter used to demonstrate the benefits of anti-lock brakes. While ABS is a boon to automobiles, the technology is of even greater import to motorcyclists. Experienced riders learn to treat their front brakes with equal measures of respect and fear. Eighty per cent of a motorcycle’s stopping power comes from the front disc, yet locking the front tire almost always results in a crash. There are entire generations of bikers for whom using the front brake was verboten. I vividly remember the first time I tested the ground-breaking 1988 BMW K100’s anti-lock brakes; it took me at least 10 attempts before I squeezed the front brake lever hard enough to initiate ABS action. My mind said yes, but a certain nether region more atuned to pain and calamity kept overruling my right hand.

    The outrigger bikes were liberating. Freed from the trepidation of sliding along on one’s butt, I was able to lock up the front brake and, for the first time in this motorcyclist’s life, experience a “crash” without the requisite trip to the hospital. As a demonstration of the benefits of anti-lock brakes on motorcycles, this exercise knows no equal.

    Of course, that still left those aforementioned dirt bikes and that beckoning oval. Now, were I more mature or mindful of other people’s feelings, I would be reticent to reveal the result of our inter-media competition. But the aforementioned tricycle racing injuries have finally healed and, hell, I’m a guy, so the truth is we spanked ’em.


    1:00 pm on May 17, 2012
     
  • LONDON — General Motors will build the next generation of its Astra compact in Britain after workers at its factory in Ellesmere Port, northwest England, overwhelmingly agreed to a new labour deal, leaving its plant in Bochum, Germany in danger of closure.

    The carmaker said on Thursday it would invest $202-million in the Ellesmere Port plant, where assembly of the new vehicle will start in 2015.

    Britain’s Unite union said 94% of those balloted voted in favour of changes to working conditions and that some 700 jobs would be created at the plant, securing its future until 2020.

    “It’s almost certain that one of GM’s German plants will now be closed, probably the plant in Bochum,” a source close to the negotiations said.

    GM, which sells under the Vauxhall brand in Britain, is expected to halt production of the Astra, its most important model, at its main plant in Russelsheim, Germany, making the car only at Ellesmere Port and at Poland’s Gliwice plant from 2015.

    The source added that some production of GM’s Chevrolet marque could be shifted from Asia to Europe, with Russelsheim the likely beneficiary. This would leave the Opel factory at Bochum as the most likely site to be closed.

    The decision is one of the most dramatic so far as Europe’s carmakers look to restructure or consolidate in response to more than four years of falling demand and profits.

    Many factories are running at partial capacity — analysts estimate automakers have cut some 3-million cars, or 20%, from their production lines — and still producers struggle to sell their wares.

    Opel made a loss of $757-million last year.

    The U.K. deal means an extra third production shift will be added at the Vauxhall factory to ensure 24-hour a day running, as well as the introduction of weekend working to guarantee the factory works at full capacity.

    The source added that production at the plant, whose sole product is the Astra, would initially rise from 140,000 cars a year to 160,000, with the potential to hit around 220,000.

    Workers agreed a four-year pay deal including a pay freeze for two years, followed by rises of around 3% for the next two years, the source added.

    “We have been able to develop a responsible labor agreement that secures the plant’s future,” Vauxhall chairman Duncan Aldred said.

    “This is assisted by the government‘s industrial strategy, increasing its focus on the manufacturing sector and creating ideal ground for companies to build up long-term investments.”

    There had been speculation earlier this year that the plant could miss out on investment by GM because it sources most of its parts from Europe and exports the majority of its cars there.

    The deal will provide a boost to the British government, which is grappling with a recession and weak opinion poll ratings.

    Securing increased production by foreign-owned carmakers based in Britain has been one of the few bright spots in a drive by politicians to boost manufacturing and rebalance the economy away from financial services.

    “Once again we have seen the success of the U.K. automotive industry and the crucial role it plays in growing and rebalancing our economy,” British Prime Minister David Cameron said.

    “This has been a real team effort with the government, the company, unions and workers all focused on keeping production in the U.K.”

    Japan’s Nissan and Toyota as well as Tata Motors’ Jaguar Land Rover have committed their futures to production in Britain in recent months.

    Britain now exports more cars than it imports for the first time since 1976, official figures released on Wednesday showed.

    © Thomson Reuters 2012


    9:24 am on May 17, 2012
     
  • CD players could become the next victim of the struggle to shed pounds from cars in the name of fuel efficiency.

    In an interview with the Detroit Free Press, Ford designer Michael Arbaugh said he was “looking forward to the day” when designers ditch CD players on dashboards forever.

    The reason is simple — CD players weigh 2.2 kilograms, even more when you factor in the CDs carried — and that’s valuable weight which has a direct impact on the fuel efficiency of modern cars.

    A year ago, that may not have mattered so much, but in a world where high gas prices have become the norm and the environmental agenda is more prominent than ever, automakers are getting into the details to shed the pounds. They’re also aware that CDs are becoming a device of the past.

    “I think anybody under 30 is probably using all MP3 devices. They don’t buy CDs,” Arbaugh said.

    That consideration is likely to accelerate automakers’ moves to remove physical media players from their cars, meaning we could witness the death of the CD drive far faster than we saw the death of the tape player.

    Last year, Ford dropped multi-disk CD players from its European Ford Focus line, noting that 95% of the model’s buyers chose versions with MP3 device connection and 90% chose a Bluetooth wireless connection.

    The Chevrolet Sonic RS also ditched an optical drive in favour of MyLink, which allows access to MP3 players and the streaming of music from sites such as Pandora.

    Earlier this year, research company Stratacom predicted that about 331,000 cars will be sold without CD players in the United States this year,  jumping to 12.1-million by 2018.


    1:00 pm on May 16, 2012
     
  • Japanese automaker Toyota has retaken the crown as the world’s largest automaker.

    Initial sales reports for 2012 so far suggest that the Japanese brand, which was badly hit by natural disasters last year, is now outselling American rival General Motors.

    Toyota was the world’s largest automaker between 2008 and 2010, but lost its crown to GM after the Japanese earthquake and then flooding in Thailand seriously disrupted its production.

    Now the brand is back on top, having sold 2.49-million between January and March, compared to 2.28-million by GM.

    Volkswagen, the world’s No. 3, sold 2.16-million, Bloomberg calculated.

    Many observers consider Toyota to be in a better position now than it has been in years — with global gas prices still high, demand for its fuel-efficient vehicles is soaring, especially for the Prius.
    Demand for the model in the United States alone is outpacing the prediction of 220,000 vehicles sold in 2012, Toyota said, with the Prius comfortably selling more in April than competitors such as the Nissan Leaf and the Chevrolet Volt combined.

    Last week it unveiled its first all-electric vehicle, the RAV4 EV, at an electric vehicle show in Los Angeles.

    The electrified SUV is a reprise of one of the world’s first electric vehicles, the original RAV4 electric, with several new enhancements. It’s been developed with the help of leading electric automaker Tesla, and now features a 160 km range and performance equivalent to the gas-powered RAV4.


    8:00 am on May 16, 2012
     
  • NEW DELHI — Honda launched the lowest-cost motorbike in its lineup on Tuesday for sale in the India market, aiming to double India’s share of its motorcycle revenue by the end of the decade while racing to catch up with rivals in fast-growing emerging markets.

    Honda, the world’s largest motorcycle manufacturer and Japan’s third-biggest carmaker, has struggled to make major inroads in high-growth, price-sensitive markets such as India, where a former joint venture deal once excluded it from the key commuter motorbike segment.

    Commuter bikes account for around 70% of India’s motorcycle market, which grew 14% over the last financial year to 10-million sold and is second only to China.

    “It’s very positive for Honda that they can finally compete in the mass market here,” said Vineet Hetamasaria, automotive analyst at PINC Research in Mumbai.

    “The pricing is in the right area … and given Honda’s brand equity, the bike is definitely going to make a dent in the market shares of others.”

    The motorcycle is Honda’s cheapest worldwide, Keita Muramatsu, president of Honda Motorycle & Scooter India, said at the bike’s launch in New Delhi.

    Honda, the top seller of scooters in the Indian market but lagging in larger commuter bikes, has been steadily raising production and sales across the two-wheeler segment since it ended a 26-year joint venture with India’s Hero in March of last year in an $852,991,340 deal.

    It has since announced fresh investment worth 20-billion rupees ($373,872,820) as it looks to chase down Hero, its former partner and the current market leader in commuter motorcycles.

    The Japanese company is constructing its third two-wheeler factory in the country and overtook Bajaj Auto as the country’s No. 2 in two-wheeler sales in March.

    Honda expects India to account for 30% of its global motorcycle revenue by 2020, up from 13% now, Muramatsu said.

    The Japanese automaker, which also builds cars in India, has been less aggressive than global rivals such as General Motors and Volkswagen in targeting emerging markets such as India and China.

    It abandoned a one-size-fits-all global parts sourcing approach in its car business in 2010 to search for local suppliers for its global plants to help it reduce costs.

    Dressed in a Honda T-shirt, Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar unveiled the 110cc Dream Yuga motorcycle on Tuesday, touting the advantages of a motorbike over a car on the clogged roads of India’s cities.

    Sales of motorbikes, a family vehicle for millions of Indians, outstripped car sales by five to one in the last financial year, partly helped by high interest rates and fuel costs that pushed up the price of automobile ownership.

    “India will be the most important market and will continue to be in focus for the next 10 years,” said Yadvinder Singh Guleria, marketing head for Honda India. He added that Honda expected to boost exports from India to 150,000 two-wheelers in the year to March 2013 from 111,000 the year before.

    Globally, two-wheelers accounted for about one-sixth of Honda’s revenue in the latest financial year to March 2012.

    Other Japanese motorcycle makers are also ramping up capacity and targeting volumes in India.

    Yamaha this week announced a new $280,665,200 factory in India to nearly triple capacity to 2.8-million motorcycles by 2018, while Suzuki, which will likely launch a mass-market offering this month, is building a new factory to take its India capacity to close to 1-million motorcycles by 2014.

    © Thomson Reuters 2012


    1:00 pm on May 15, 2012
     
  • How often have you sold something and even at the moment of the transaction known it was a mistake, at least emotionally if not monetarily? I have to admit that this has happened to me on far more than one occasion.

    Looking back, I think the very first time I had an acute attack of seller’s remorse was in the early 1980s. I had been the proud owner of a 1952 Dodge M series weapons carrier, an old military vehicle. I had bought it surplus for $800, which matched its mileage perfectly as it had 800 miles (1,287 kilometres) on it. I drove it for several years and restored it to exactly mimic a Korean War truck used by the 101 Airborne, the Screaming Eagles. That truck and I had many adventures. But when I moved back to the Toronto area, it seemed not quite as sensible a choice of transport as when I had lived north of Kitchener-Waterloo.

    I don’t remember who bought it, but I do vividly remember it being driven away, up the road and out of my life. It was replaced by a lightly used six-month-old Volkswagen Sirocco, undoubtedly the worst car I have ever owned, but that is another story.

    I had a string of I-don’t-care vehicles for years after. It was not until I had established the restoration business that I ended up selling another vehicle I have since always missed. It was another truck, a 1942 one-ton Fargo stake truck, one of six produced for the civilian market in 1942 and delivered to a farm near London, Ont. All the rest of Fargo production that year was military trucks.

    It was a lovely thing, much fancier than its Dodge counterpart and very art deco in design. It wasn’t fast, but it didn’t care how much it carried — it still did 72 kilometres an hour. It was a lovely creature, but I had moved about 50 km from work at the time, so I didn’t use it. It sat forlorn outside the shop as I didn’t have inside storage room for it. The weather soon started to have its way with the old thing and, after putting only 10 km on it in an entire year, I sold it — for its own sake.

    Of course, not a month after selling it, I came across a property that I couldn’t  pass up and ended up living less than four km from work, an easy drive for the old girl, but, alas, too late. I still have pangs. I would love her back as she could be put to work hauling hay and doing chores back on the farm. I am 50 km away again but in the opposite direction. With a farm, I could really use a good old stake truck. My vintage long-wheelbase military Land Rover, which I almost sold, lives there (are we sensing a theme here?) and does fencing duties and small tasks around the property. This keeps it healthy and useful and I have an excuse to keep it.

    My next lost love is a car, but one that Ettore Bugatti called the world’s fastest truck. It was a 1929 4.2-litre Lemans Bentley and perhaps the greatest vehicular love affair of my life. I acquired it with a partner and there’s the rub. If I didn’t have a partner, then I would never have sold it. However, if I didn’t have a partner, then I would never have bought it, so I guess having it for a while was better than never having it at all. The car was like a great green leather-covered train with Union Jacks painted on the sides. I revelled in driving it well above the speed limit wherever we went, quite simply hoping for a ticket so I could go to court and brag to the judge, “Yes, Your Honour, I was doing 110 in an 80, but it was in a 1929 Bentley!”

    My partner never got the car, which always surprised me as he usually had great taste in both art and cars. At his urging (nagging), we sold it. We got somewhere around $250,000 for it, but I hated the sale. I hate it even more now on a more mercenary level.  If I were to get the opportunity to buy it back, I would have to pony up almost $1-million and that is not happening any time soon. I could have sold it for the same amount and that would certainly have taken the edge off the pain of loss.

    The last breakup I had was with my supercharged Lotus Exige, a car that is about as far from being a truck as it’s possible to get. While I traded it for a Lotus Evora, a great car in its own right, the Evora is civilized and refined, a luxurious sport car. The Exige was a little savage, hard to get into and out of, featuring a Spartan interior, no real vision out the window as the engine is in the way and with a suspension that is painfully unkind to full bladders and intolerant of mistakes. It was, in short, a driver’s car, and I missed it the moment I penned the deal on the new Evora.

    The one consolation is that, unlike lost love with high school crushes and old girlfriends, you can promise yourself that one day you’ll have another  just like the one that got away.


    8:00 am on May 15, 2012
     
  • I can’t remember if it was the first or second time the price of gasoline rose above $1.20 a litre, but it was around that time that I stopped really caring whether mid-sized family sedans came with six-cylinder engines or not. Oh, I might miss the silky smoothness of a half-dozen under-stressed pistons moving up and down, delivering a surplus of horses to effortlessly waft the car along at highway speeds, but the more fuel-efficient four-cylinder versions had vastly improved and were no longer the coarse gutless wonders they once were. Plus, any engine that lengthened the time between costly fill-ups at the pumps was OK by me.

    Some automakers have become so confident in their four-bangers that they have dropped V6s from their sedans’ powertrain repertoires — think Hyundai and its Sonata or, a little more upscale, Audi and the A4. Recently, Mazda officials have said that the next-generation Mazda6, due out next year as a 2014 model, will not be offered with a V6, instead relying on some version of the automaker’s newly developed SkyActiv four-cylinder.

    That’s a year away, though, which means Mazda has to soldier on selling the existing 6 with consumers (at least, the more aware ones) knowing a brand new model is in the pipeline — not an ideal situation.

    Although the Mazda6 was considered bold in 2009, in terms of its design, sporty handling and increased cabin size, since then, Toyota’s Camry, the Kia Optima/Hyundai Sonata near-twins, Subaru’s Legacy and the Volkswagen Passat, among others, have all been totally redesigned — the first three sedans with highly styled exteriors that render the Mazda6’s look a bit less forward by comparison. Plus, there will be new versions of the Nissan Altima and Honda Accord this year.

    Still, it’s not as though the 6 is without merit. It continues to be offered in two trims — the base GS and the topline GT — either available with a 170-horsepower 2.5-litre four-cylinder (which is the more popular choice in Canada) or a 272-hp 3.7L. Four-cylinder models come standard with a six-speed manual transmission — a rarity in the family sedan segment — or an optional five-speed manumatic (standard with the V6).

    Other than the previously mentioned inherent smoothness of the six-cylinder engine, the GT-I4 tester lacks for little, its near-$30,000 price tag ensuring a satisfactory number of modern conveniences and safety features. And the four-cylinder, while not the latest word in technical sophistication (lacking, for now, Mazda’s SkyActiv fuel-saving trickery), goes about its business with a minimum of fuss and bother. Yes, it is a tad growly under acceleration, but it smoothes out rather nicely when cruising along. There is enough oomph from the 2.5L four to get the sedan to speed in reasonable time and the five-speed makes the most out of the engine’s available torque. The self-shifting aspect is a nice touch, with generally crisp upshifts but little in the way of added sportiness. Critics will note that most of the 6’s newer competitors offer more power from their four-bangers, which tend to be paired with six-speed autoboxes.

    However, the one primary benefit of the four-cylinder — enhanced fuel efficiency — is somehow lacking in the 6. It’s reputation for middling fuel economy was borne out with a test average of 10.1 litres per 100 kilometres in a mix of city and highway use.
    Speaking of reputations, Mazdas have always been about sportier handling, no matter what the vehicle or its drivetrain — and the GT-I4 follows this formula. The sedan trades a measure of coddling for road feel — an acceptable compromise in my books. It’s a nimble car to drive with well-weighted steering and a suspension setup that is more European in feel than its Asian peers. The large-ish P235/45R18 rubber assists in the road-holding duties — to a point. Get too frisky with the 6 and its nose heaviness (weight distribution is 60/40 front to rear) will make itself known in the form of progressive understeer. Traction and stability control systems act as safety backups.

    I’ve been somewhat baffled by Mazda’s use of GT to connote its cars’ top trim level. To my mind, GT should represent something with a decidedly sportier bent than other models, rather than luxury and mod-cons. No matter, the GT-I4 tester is very well fitted, with all the usual power items plus an AM/FM/CD/MP3 stereo with six speakers, Bluetooth hands-free phone system, leather interior, heated front seats, auto dimming rear-view mirror with HomeLink and speed-sensing door locks. Content doesn’t necessarily equate to luxury, however, and the cabin is where the Mazda6 is most dated. There is too much hard black plastic in use and the instruments and controls with their orange jet-fighter-like illumination are positively retro. Credit, though, must be given for enough room for six-foot adults, the high-mounted bucket seats and the car’s generally good sightlines.

    This version of the Mazda6 is no longer at the forefront of the family sedan segment. But that doesn’t mean it’s out to pasture. If you can live with merely average fuel economy (for a four-cylinder sedan) and styling that’s no longer overt, you will be rewarded with a car that thinks it’s a sport sedan. If style and fuel economy are your thing, just wait a year. The 2014 Mazda6 will knock your socks off.

    THE SPECS

    Power 170 hp @ 6,000 rpm; 167 lb-ft of torque @ 4,000 rpm
    Transmission Five-speed manumatic (optional)
    Brakes Four-wheel disc with ABS
    Tires P235/45R18
    Price: base/as tested $29,395/$30,595
    Destination charge $1,695
    Transport Canada fuel economy L/100 km 9.4 city, 6.5 hwy.
    Standard features Power windows, door locks and heated mirrors, cruise control, automatic dual-zone climate control, AM/FM/CD/MP3 stereo with six speakers and auxiliary audio input, keyless entry, external temperature
    display, power driver’s seat, heated front seats, leather interior, anti-theft alarm system, trip computer, auto-dimming rear-view mirror with HomeLink, centre console with slide armrest and storage box, xenon automatic headlights with manual levelling, speed-sensing door locks, 18-inch alloy wheels, fog lights, LED tail lights
    Options Automatic transmission ($1,200)


    1:00 pm on May 14, 2012
     
  • DETROIT — Auto suppliers’ relations with Toyota and Honda have soured to the worst level in 11 years, but U.S. automakers have won more trust, a survey showed.

    The two largest Japanese automakers managed to retain the top two slots, respectively, in an annual survey of suppliers about their rapport with automakers that make cars and trucks in North America.

    But their scores fell to the lowest point since the study introduced its “working relations” index in 2002. General Motors and Chrysler continued to occupy the bottom two slots, but they achieved their highest marks yet.

    The narrowing gap suggests that the six major automakers in the United States are “converging toward mediocrity,” said John Henke, president of Planning Perspectives Inc., which conducted the survey released on Monday.

    Salespeople from 439 major suppliers were polled in late March and early April. There were 564 respondents.

    About 70% of the parts in a car are provided by suppliers, which make everything from seats to screws to sensors. Having good relationships with the supply base can help automakers build better vehicles more efficiently.

    Ford and Nissan held their spots at No. 3 and No. 4, respectively.

    From 2004 to 2008, Toyota and Honda earned high marks from suppliers because of their willingness to work with companies to lower costs. During that period, the three U.S. automakers adopted a more combative approach, which cost them in the rankings.

    But during the recession, Toyota and Honda offered buyouts for employees, leaving them with a less-experienced workforce, Henke said. The supply crunch triggered by the tsunami in Japan last year exacerbated the problem.

    “The buyers, the folks who have the day-to-day responsibilities, just aren’t doing the right thing,” he said. “We’ve had suppliers tell us in a couple cases that they don’t know the Toyota Way. That’s creating some problems for them.”

    At the same time, Chrysler and GM have adopted a more collaborative approach. The gap between top-rated Toyota and Chrysler, which was ranked last, shrank to 48 points in 2012 from 106 points in 2011.

    Automakers with scores above 350 are considered to have a “good” or “very good” relationships with the supply base — much like an “A” grade. A mark below 250 signals “poor” or “very poor” relations. Between those two points is “adequate.”

    Suppliers are more willing to offer discounts and invest in new technology for their favoured customers. They give fewer concessions to automakers that are intractable and unfair negotiators or make last-minute engineering changes that can hurt a supplier’s bottom line.

    For the fourth straight year, not one of the six automakers in the survey showcased a good relationship with the supply sector. It is possible for Toyota and Honda to recover their lost ground within four years, Henke said.

    It can be difficult to restore trust with suppliers, but not impossible. Ford, which ranked last in 2007, jumped to the third spot in 2010 at a time when the entire company was restructuring. It has been in the No. 3 spot ever since.

    GM and Chrysler, the two U.S. automakers that took federal bailouts three years ago, have languished at the bottom of the list since 2008, but have both made strides.

    Under former purchasing chief Dan Knott, Chrysler made the biggest improvement of any other automaker on the list in the last three years. In 2010, 71% of suppliers described their relations with Chrysler as poor. By 2012, that shrank to 46%, on par with Ford.

    Henke projected that GM and Chrysler could continue to improve their rankings over the next three to four years, but only if the Detroit automakers do not slip back into their old ways as some suppliers have noted.

    “A couple of them said, ‘We helped them out when things were bad; they seem to have forgotten that,’” Henke said.

    © Thomson Reuters 2012


    11:06 am on May 14, 2012