c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel

Updates from March, 2012

  • You gotta love capitalism. Yesterday’s terrorist haven is today’s burgeoning market. In a recent report in Automotive News, none other than Iraq is the new darling of major automobile manufacturers. The automotive tome noted that Volkswagen, General Motors, Ford and Chrysler are all pushing to expand their presence in the formerly (and, skeptics might say still) war-torn Middle Eastern country.

    Iraq’s automobile market is currently less than 100,000 units annually, but, thanks to rising incomes, rapid economic growth and so-called safer streets (hey, only “1,500 Iraqi civilians were killed by bombs, sniper and roadside ambushes last year,” according to Automotive News, down from a peak of 34,500 in 2006), so Automotive News is reporting that some major players are forecasting growth of as much as 30%. General Motors already sells 32,000 cars there a year, making it the company’s second largest market in the Middle East after Saudi Arabia. That’s a mere pittance compared with the 9.025 million vehicles The General sold last year, but the company had targeted the Middle East for expansion. Sectarian violence, improvised explosive devices and state-fuelled religious intolerance be damned, we can sell them some cars, so let’s build us some dealerships.

    Of course, any additional successful market is desperately needed if the auto industry’s recent revival is to continue unabated. China is, by most estimations, slowing its recently explosive growth. Ditto India. And just when you thought we could go back to ignoring the Europeans (thanks to the collective sigh we all breathed when Greece’s bond devaluation deal was finally signed) comes news that the entire EU auto market is about to come tumbling down, dragging all of us with it.

    Bloomberg News is reporting that General Motors sees “clearly deteriorating” sales exacerbating the same kind of production overcapacity that crippled the American auto industry before its bankruptcies/restructuring/debt reduction of 2009 to 2011. According to Dan Amman, GM’s chief financial officer, worsening vehicle pricing — transaction prices are said to have dropped more than $200 in just the last three months — indicate greatly reduced demand. GM, Bloomberg reports, lost $747-million in Europe last year and $15.6-billion since 1999. The $420-million tie-up with PSA/Peugeot-Citroën reported in this column two weeks ago is the company’s most recent attempt to address its overcapacity issues.

    And, unlike the most recent downturn, automakers are not counting on government “scrappage” incentives to artificially boost sales. Despite the recent improvement in Greece’s debt relief, the European economy continues to sour, weighed down by massive debt, debilitating unemployment and chronic over-regulation of the industry. Throw in the fact that, by some estimations, the Europeans may have as much as 20% too much automobile production capacity for current market demands and you have the same recipe for disaster that plagued the U.S. automakers through the last two decades.

    The difference is that our domestic auto industry has already swallowed its Buckley’s — you know, “It tastes awful. But it works” — General Motors declaring bankruptcy (as did Chrysler), shucking income-dragging brands (as did Ford), laying off workers (as did both Chrysler and Ford) and shuttering plants (ditto Chrysler and Ford). Save for the seemingly never-ending death spiral of Saab (and its demise was sparked by GM), Europeans did not react to — or, as those nasty vulture capitalists might say, did not take advantage of — the Great Recession with any dramatic restructuring. Indeed, Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne recently called for European Union intervention in reducing the industry’s overcapacity, though Volkswagen, the only major European automaker to make a profit last year, rejects such calls for government intervention.
    The result, as anyone who’s ever tried to peel off a Band-Aid slowly knows, would appear to be a simple delay of the inevitable pain. Hence why Opel is crawling into bed with PSA/Peugeot-Citroën and Fiat is willing to sleep with, well, just about anybody. Volkswagen is said to be fuelling the troublesome price declines by using its heft — and profits from its successful luxury brands — to buy market share. No wonder Marchionne has been so preoccupied with expanding his Fiat/Chrysler/Who-wants-to-love-me-now conglomerate.

    Of course, all this may be the same tempest in a teapot that the Greek debt crisis turned out to be (says he, crossing all his fingers and toes in the hopes that he jumped back into the stock market at the right time). The Economist, in its latest issue — Crikey, Ginger! Can It Be … The Recovery?!! — is predicting a steady, if subdued, recovery (albeit with the same aforementioned crossing of hearts and hoping to die) that would seem to make any weakness in the European auto market of minimal consequence.

    Of course, General Motors guaranteed it was not declaring Chapter 11 and Rob Ford promised Torontonians a subway.


    8:00 am on March 29, 2012
     
  • Haven’t we heard this malarkey before? Sergio Marchionne, CEO of Fiat and erstwhile American automaker Chrysler, wants another partnership, this time with someone out east, say Mazda or Suzuki. It’s all part of Marchionne’s theory that only the largest shall survive the impending shakeup about to wreak havoc in the automotive industry. Or so says his crystal ball.

    Meanwhile, General Motors is hooking up with PSA/Peugeot-Citroën to cure the travails of its perennial money-losing subsidiary, Opel. Of course, having the French telling the Germans how to improve efficiency is a little like the Italians explaining to Americans how to make more reliable cars. Methinks the saviour brings precious little to the table.

    But Marchionne is committed — as GM seems again — to the ideal that, in the automotive world, bigger is always better. The combination of Fiat and Chrysler is still selling about 50% too few cars for its be-sweatered CEO, who sees eight million cars a year as the lower threshold of viability for a major player in the industry (by the way, only GM, Toyota and Volkswagen currently meet that criteria).

    The problem is that, while the merge-and-acquire theorem of success may make sense on a corporate ledger and in the heartless synapses of chartered accountants, it hasn’t worked so well in real life.

    General Motors, as the name implies, has been a veritable smorgasbord of disparate automakers, some still current (Chevrolet, Buick, Cadillac and GMC), some recently departed (Saab, Saturn, Oldsmobile, Pontiac and Hummer) and still others long forgotten (McLaughlin, Oakland and countless more). But, although the company has recently returned to what I am sure it sees as its rightful place atop the global sales chart, its success is hardly about the bigger-is-better motif. Indeed, quite the opposite; the company didn’t return to the black until its recent forced ditching of underperforming brands. Its recent success has more to do with jettisoning debt, contracts and loads of unloved model lines than any expansion of its portfolio.

    Ditto Chrysler. It seems like only yesterday that Daimler was welcoming the Auburn, Mich.-based automaker into its bosom only to have the entire merger of unequals fall apart in internecine jealousies nine years later. Does anyone really think it is Fiat’s superior management that is floating Chrysler’s boat or, as is more likely, the shedding of debt and obligation through bankruptcy that is feeding the company’s recent glorious turnaround?

    Meanwhile, Ford, arguably the most successful of Detroit’s once mighty Big Three, became the darling of the automotive media largely because it dumped — voluntarily in this case — all its extraneous brands. Aston Martin, Jaguar, Land Rover and Volvo were all sold/dispensed/thrown-to-the-wolves so that it might concentrate on its core brand (OK, two core brands, but many wish the Blue Oval would also deep-six laggardly Lincoln as well). Even then — and still — profitable Mazda, one of the apples Marchionne reportedly covets, was largely shunted aside.

    Even the latest darling of the grandiose, Volkswagen, is finding managing so many disparate interests difficult. Remember three years ago when VW’s takeover of Porsche was imminent? Well, the actual nuptials are still as elusive as a George Clooney “I do” and, indeed, VW’s majordomo, Ferdinand Piech, is in trouble with German law-and-order types because a German court couldn’t figure out whose interests he was serving when the whole mess went down (Piech served on the supervisory board of Porsche at the time of the imbroglio while also being the chairman of VW).

    Meanwhile, the other apple of Marchionne’s eye, Suzuki, is in the midst of a separation from Volkswagen as acrimonious as any Kardashian divorce. The German and Japanese automakers penned a stock-swap partnership back in 2009, but that fell apart when Suzuki approached — you guessed it — Fiat for a new diesel engine instead of relying on partner Volkswagen (if this is starting to sound like TMZ Television or an episode of Big Love to you, you’re not the only one).

    The more you look at recent automotive history, the more the odds are against the success of mergers/partnerships, so much so that one has to wonder about the true motivation of these recent developments. I suspect General Motors’ announcement of the Peugeot alliance is just GM doing what it has traditionally always done, trying to acquire expertise. And, likewise, I suspect that Marchionne’s true rationale for incessant acquiring/partnering is that he wants to dilute the importance of the troublesome Fiat division as much as possible (since he took over the Italian automaker, he’s been fighting with Fiat’s unions and trying to move as much production as possible out of Italy). Indeed, things seem so desperate Automotive News is reporting that Marchionne tried to broker an alliance between GM and Fiat (cue those Hollywood bed-hopping metaphors again).

    GM will not solve Opel’s over-capacity production problem and declining market share by joining hands with similarly challenged Peugeot. And the solution to the problem of managing two disparate car companies with vastly different cultures is not to make it a threesome. Contrary to what actor Bill Paxton and his band of merry Mormons think, the solution to one troubled relationship is not adding yet another spouse to the household.

    And, if the drama in the four-wheel world isn’t enough, CAR magazine is reporting that Audi, Volkswagen’s luxury arm, is looking to purchase superbike specialist Ducati, possibly by mid-April.


    8:00 am on March 15, 2012
     
  • By Scott Deveau

    When Chrysler Group LLC brought its Fiat 500 to Canada last spring, most industry observers expected it to be a niche player, maybe selling 1,500 units or so across the country a year at best.

    But the tiny car has proved to be much more successful than anyone thought. More than 5,700 Fiat 500s have been sold across the country since it was introduced last March, outselling the Dodge Viper, Charger, and Avenger, and placing it just behind the Chrysler 200 and 300 as the company’s most popular passenger car in 2011.

    The subcompact’s unexpected success has been the direct result of a sales surge in Quebec, which accounted for 43% of Fiat 500 sales in Canada last year. “The Quebec performance has surprised us a little bit,” said Reid Bigland, Chrysler Canada chief executive. “Although, I did get a bit of a feel when travelling around Quebec there is a very strong Fiat club there. But it has exceeded my expectations.”

    Sales have been so brisk in in Quebec that Chrysler was forced to increase the number of Fiat dealerships it planned in Quebec to 25 from 15 of the 70 stores across Canada.

    Mr. Bigland said he was also hoping Chrysler’s new Dodge Dart, which is based on the Alfa Romeo Giulietta, will play well in the market when it is introduced in June.

    “When you look at Quebec in general, it slants more to smaller compact vehicles to begin with, whereas the West slants more to pickup trucks. Ontario is a bit of a mix,” he said.

    “Quebec is a bit of a distinct society and is more aligned with Europe in many respects than it is the rest of North America. The Fiat going in had two things going for it: a small car and a very European, Italian style.”

    Quebec has long been the leading market in Canada for compact and subcompact vehicles.

    Read the full story here.


    11:56 am on February 23, 2012
     
  • Chrysler’s Dodge brand is resurrecting the Dart name for an all-new four-door compact sedan that will make its world debut at next month’s North American International Auto Show in Detroit.

    According to Chrysler, the all-new 2013 Dodge Dart is a “thoroughly modern vehicle that’s fuel-efficient, beautifully designed and crafted, agile and brings fun back to driving in the segment.”

    The Dart is the first Chrysler Group vehicle based upon a Fiat architecture, in this case the Alfa Romeo Giulietta. The Dart will have a lengthened and widened platform that Chrysler says will deliver segment-leading levels of interior roominess.  It will also have four-wheel independent suspension and available 18-inch wheels.

    The Dart will be available with a choice of  three four-cylinder engines. Drivers can select from a new Tigershark 16-valve 2.0-litre engine, a 16-valve 1.4L MultiAir Intercooled Turbo engine or a new Tigershark 16-valve 2.4L MultiAir four-cylinder. Chrysler says these three engines, combined with three transmission choices, combine to redefine performance by providing the most diverse powertrain lineup in its class.

    For now, Chrysler is only providing teaser photos of the new Dart. According to the automaker’s press release, however, the car will have “eye-catching exterior proportions set off from every angle by dynamic lines and curves, along with advanced technology, to deliver class-leading aerodynamic performance.” Further details include  a split-crosshair grille, projector headlamps and fog lamps and accentuated fenders.

    “Signature Dodge full-width LED ‘racetrack’ tail lamps and class-exclusive integrated dual exhaust — both inspired by Dodge Charger – accentuate the athletic and muscular stance of this dynamic and passionate new design,” says Chrysler.

    The Dodge Dart will be built at Chrysler Group’s Belvidere Assembly Plant in Belvidere, Ill.


    11:39 am on December 6, 2011