c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel

Updates from April, 2012

  • DETROIT • General Motors is pulling the plug on its Chevrolet Avalanche pickup.

    The Avalanche, a “lifestyle” pickup that won buyers and polarized the traditionalists with its unique design and numerous features, celebrates its final year of production with the 2013 Black Diamond model.

    “More than 580,000 Avalanches have been sold since its introduction in 2001, and Avalanche has won major awards and recognitions throughout its run,” says Mark Clawson, Avalanche marketing manager. “So it is only fitting that Avalanche retires on a high note.”

    That said, Clawson admits that Avalanche sales “have tapered off in recent years.”

    The Avalanche “was one of the earliest forays into re-inventing the traditional pickup truck, says Michelle Krebs, senior analyst with Edmunds.com. “It was a vehicle that maintained the traditional truck image and capability but was more versatile for the person buying it for personal use more than work — a lifestyle truck more than a work truck. Other variations on the theme from competitors followed the Avalanche’s debut.”

    When introduced for the 2002 model year, Avalanche offered unique styling and innovative features such as a midgate that extended the bed into the cab. Storage compartments alongside the cargo box provided ample and lockable storage with pluggable drains that could be filled with ice and used as coolers. It also offered comfortable accommodations for five people.

    Recognizing the appeal of the Avalanche, Chevrolet and other truck makers began developing light-duty crew cab pickups. By 2011, crew cabs accounted for more than 65% of light-duty pickup sales in the United States, and helped transform the pickup from a workhorse into a multi-purpose family vehicle.

    The Avalanche was named 2002 Motor Trend Truck of the Year upon its introduction, and 2007 Truck of the Year by the Automotive Journalists Association of Canada.

    In Canada, Black Diamond Avalanches will feature body-coloured bed surrounds, unique badging and additional features on LS and LT models. For 2013, a rear camera, rear park assist, power-adjustable pedals, fog lamps and remote start will be added as standard equipment on LS models, while LT models have added a standard rear camera.


    1:00 pm on April 17, 2012
     
  • Dallas, Tex. • The Dodge Ram — or just Ram, as it’s now called — is being displayed at the New York Auto Show, not as a new truck but as a mid-cycle refreshening. The body changes for 2013 are minor — new grille work and some changes to the sheetmetal. However, it’s what’s under the skin that has the truck world buzzing.

    Whether Chrysler says so or not, every improvement made to the Ram is on account of one word — EcoBoost.

    This V6 engine in rival Ford’s F-150 has been a huge sales success, one that has necessitated a radical upgrade to the Ram, a truck that has long built its reputation on the Hemi V8 engine. So, mechanically, this 2013 Ram is anything but mid-cycle eye candy.

    At a very small and exclusive technical background briefing here, in advance of the New York Auto Show, I spent hours with the Ram engineers, They revealed a pickup that has more than a dozen changes to it, all aimed at reducing fuel consumption while preserving its “soul.” While there are copious changes and improvements, the one major result is that Ram claims it will beat Ford’s EcoBoost fuel economy. With gas prices spiralling upward, that’s a big one.

    The new Ram now features Chrysler’s 3.6-litre Pentastar V6 coupled to a new eight-speed transmission developed by ZF of Germany. And, while the power and fuel savings implications of this combination are obvious, it’s the sum total of all the technical changes that Ram president and CEO Fred Diaz says will beat Ford.

    The eight-speed automatic is a first for pickups. Couple it to the 305-horsepower V6 and Ram claims a 20% fuel savings over the Hemi powertrain. The engine also weighs 35 kilograms less than the V8. But the Hemi is not going away, says Ram. It continues to be available and, about six months after the Pentastar/eight-speed arrives late this year, the Hemi will also get hooked up to the ZF.

    Stop/Start technology has also been added to the truck. A proven system that has been used sparingly by various automakers, this system stops the engine at lights and restarts it as soon as the foot is lifted off the brake. This addition increases fuel efficiency by up to 3.3%, says Ram.

    Active air shutters are another first on a pickup. These vents open and close as needed for cooling. However, they also increase aerodynamics and fuel efficiency by around 0.5%, while shortening engine warm-up time.

    A new electric power steering system adds five hp to the Pentastar’s output total while reducing fuel consumption by 1.8%, says Ram. This proven system eliminates the constant power draw of a hydraulic pump as well as offering revised steering effort calibrations matched to speed and road conditions, which in turn reduce driver fatigue.

    Alternators produce way more power than is needed by most trucks’ electrically run components, so Chrysler has developed a pulse-width modulation system that reduces parasitic electrical draw by the fuel system and cooling fan. This in turn reduces fuel consumption by 0.4% and increases component durability.

    Even though the Ram is a mid-cycle upgrade, the engineering team couldn’t help redesigning parts of the frame. By using high-strength steel, the truck’s weight was reduced by 14 kg. The 2013 Ram also comes with new low-rolling resistance tires. Plus, the front air dam, made from a rubberized polymer, has been lengthened to improve air flow, adding a 0.6% improvement to the Ram fuel economy.

    Adding a new wheel-to-wheel side step was found to be aerodynamically more efficient, delivering an added 0.5% fuel consumption improvement. Another bonus is that the longer step now provides a foothold for reaching into the front of the box.
    Beyond improvements to maximize fuel economy, the 2013 Ram has added an air spring suspension option.  This system will automatically adjust to speed and load, while manually operated settings will be available for off-road operation and even a low-profile “park” mode. The truck will be able to rise and lower as much as 100 millimetres with the press of a button.

    The new transmission comes with a new gear shifter — a rotary dial on the dashboard. Also new is the availability of the Crew Cab with a longer 6-foot-4 box.

    The 2013 Ram with all these upgrades will arrive in dealer showrooms in the last quarter of this year.


    8:00 am on April 6, 2012
     
  • It would be easy to accuse Old Man Winter of being nothing more than a poser this year.

    Oh, sure, the Weather Network would frequently get all up in arms over some allegedly approaching low from Colorado that threatened to smother us with 30 or more centimetres of snow, but, in reality, we never saw more than 15 cm from any single “storm.”

    And while Southern Ontario looked more like Virginia for most of the season, here in Ottawa, at least, we got something resembling winter. When our world finally turned white on Dec. 24, it remained that way to this day, giving us some good opportunity to test the 2012 Toyota Tacoma Double Cab TRD V6 we borrowed from Toyota Canada for eight weeks.

    Unlike a regular one-week test, the long-term experience provided enough time to genuinely measure what the Tacoma could do over a whole series of challenges, from hauling out big logs across a frozen swamp to carrying large objects in the bed to reaching my old, out-of-the-way cottage that sits at the end of an unplowed lane near Westport, Ont.

    Through it all, the $37,125 Tacoma never faltered. Even on some treacherously icy roads recently, the Tacoma gingerly negotiated its way through and down various hills without so much as a single scrape from a branch, much the same as it did after a fresh snowfall that left my lane covered in 15 cm of new snow. Equipped with Toyo Observe GSi-5 winter tires, the Tacoma was pretty much unstoppable no matter what the weather. Its four-wheel-drive system and two-speed transfer case, activated by a simple switch on the dash, made all the difference. And only twice did I call upon L4 to carry me through, though H4 was used on a regular basis.

    The 2012 Tacoma received some mild upgrades ahead of an entirely new model expected to come out either in 2013 or 2014 — the next new generation of Tacoma that is likely to borrow from the fifth-generation 4Runner SUV, itself a highly regarded and capable truck. For 2012, the Tacoma received modest changes to the front fascia and some interior upgrades that went a long way to making this model more current.

    Still, there is much to build upon. Unlike the 4Runner, the Tacoma interior feels close. Side mirrors do not come with a defrost function. There is no sunroof option. Storage is less than bountiful. There is no 120-volt power outlet in the cab. Rear-seat legroom is tight. Interior lighting is subpar. Climate control is manual only (though it generates great heat).  Some switchgear feels dated. There’s no fuel economy gauge. Outside, there’s no lock for the rear tailgate. There’s no factory bed light and I’m pretty certain I could live without the non-functioning hood scoop.

    And while I might have criticized the ride from the TRD suspension as being unduly hard at the start of the test, I’ve grown to appreciate the firmness — at least with winter tires. Summer tires may prove to stiffen the ride a little too much, but the firm ride makes the Tacoma TRD feel extremely tough over a variety of harsh conditions. I liked it and found it easy to live with on a daily basis. At all times, the ride was quiet, solid and rattle-free.

    The engine and braking are ample for the Tacoma. While it was surprising to see drum brakes in the rear, the stopping distances on dry pavement are good — though be careful on icy roads as the ABS is ultra sensitive. The 236-horsepower V6 and its 266 pound-feet of torque pull the Tacoma along impressively. Much less impressive is the fuel economy, which ranged from a best 13.6 litres per 100 kilometres on one highway excursion to a regular average of about 18.5 L/100 km from its 80-litre tank. That’s consumption closer to what a full-sized Ford F-150 with a 5.0-litre V8 or Toyota Tundra with a 4.6L V8 would achieve.

    Fuel consumption aside, the 1,624-kilogram Tacoma remains more user friendly than an F-150 simply because of its size. At 1,670 millimetres high and 1,835 wide, the Tacoma never felt large and slipped easily into the parking garage, unlike many full-sized trucks that feel as though you’re piloting a cabin cruiser in narrow waters. That partly explains why I found the Tacoma such a delight over the course of the past eight weeks: Yes, there are some shortcomings as I have pointed out, but it was easy to drive and the Tacoma always did what was demanded of it — wherever, whenever and in whatever weather.

    And now we’re at the stage where after eight weeks of driving I must bid the Tacoma adieu. Repeatedly, I have been asking myself if I should buy this Tacoma for myself since it handles all the jobs I need from a vehicle — from towing a boat in summer to reaching the old cottage on winter weekends — plus it comes with Toyota’s strong reliability and resale history.

    But as much as I enjoy this truck, I don’t love it the way I do the 4Runner, which seems that much more refined and mature. That said, if I required a mid-sized pickup truck and its open box on a regular basis, I would not consider any other midsized truck after this long-term test. Those trucks include the Honda Ridgeline, Nissan Frontier, Suzuki Equinox, Chevrolet Colorado, GMC Canyon and Ford Ranger.

    The 2012 Toyota Tacoma was a true winter slayer that slyly stole my affection each week to become a favourite companion over the season. It will be truly and deeply missed.


    1:02 pm on March 12, 2012
     
  • The Honda Ridgeline has now been part of the truck world for six years; a chunk of time that usually heralds a next-generation makeover — not the soft upgrade we’ve received for 2012. Frankly, the changes for the coming year can be covered in a paragraph.

    First, all versions of the Ridgeline get a new grille treatment, while the Sport (a new trim level) gets black 18-inch alloy wheels, a black honeycomb grille and black headlight and brake light housings. Also, as a result of aerodynamic and powertrain tuning modifications, Honda says there’s been a 2.5% improvement in the pickup’s fuel efficiency.

    Since its introduction, the Ridgeline has split its critics into two very distinct camps. Some love it, others hate it. Now with its seventh season on Canadian roads coming up, it appears the “love it” camp has held sway. Though its sales numbers have never been huge, the Ridgeline has built a following and met a need. For instance, from a driving perspective, the Ridgeline performs in a very comfortable car-like manner, with just a hint of rigidness. It also parks easily, offers good visibility and scoots around town in nimble fashion — attributes those looking for a part-time truck probably appreciate.

    So, as I drove this blacked-out Sport, I wondered not about the new minor changes but rather the future of this polarizing pickup. While the Ridgeline has changed little since 2006, the pickup market has changed enormously. Trucks have gotten larger and more powerful and most manufacturers have abandoned the small pickup market altogether, making the only players left that much more desirable to those looking for a truck smaller than a battleship.

    THE SPECS

    Type of vehicle Four-wheel-drive mid-sized pickup
    Engine 3.5L VTEC V6
    Power 250 hp @5,700  rpm ; 247 lb-ft of torque @4,300 rpm
    Transmission Five-speed automatic
    Brakes Four-wheel disc with ABS
    Tires P245/60 R18 (optional)
    Price: base/as tested $34,990/$41,990
    Destination charge $1,500
    Transport Canada fuel economy L/100 km 14.1 city, 9.8 hwy.

    This is good news for Honda. As for truck buyers (certainly, lovers of all things Honda have provided a steady customer base over the years), these changes in the pickup market itself may now bring new buyers to the unchanging Ridgeline. But, to do that, Honda has to change one thing — stop calling the truck full-sized. The automaker says its truck is a full-sized half-ton with the ability to tow 2,268 kilograms and carry a payload of 705 kg. Yes, it does that. Unfortunately, since 2006, the rest of the half-ton market has moved on. At my Canadian Truck King Challenge event last year, we towed 3,629-kg trailers and hauled 816 kg of shingles with the competing half-tons. So, when I call the Ridgeline a small truck, it’s not meant as an insult.

    In fact, while driving the Ridgeline Sport, I was reacquainted with a series of components that work well together. Its 3.5-litre VTEC V6 engine — coupled to the five-speed automatic transmission — is quiet and moderately powerful, with its output rated at 250 horsepower and 247 pound-feet of torque. Its Transport Canada fuel economy figures of  14.1 litres per 100 kilometres in the city and 9.8 L/100 km  on the highway is decent when compared with a world of V8 trucks.

    Still, even with minor massaging for 2012, the reality is that this has been the same powertrain throughout the Ridgeline’s life — and almost all the other companies have at least moved on to six-speed transmissions.

    The truck fairs better inside. Its four-door cab is roomy, with good entrance and exit both front and back. Step-in is reasonable — there’s no running board or parachute required. The interior is a classic utility-minded design with a lot of storage, dual-purpose features (such as the centre console) and a layout that has ease of cleaning in mind. Only the monotone grey colour needs updating.

    A nice feature of the Ridgeline is its standard VTM-4 (Variable Torque Management) four-wheel-drive system. This is not an aggressive off-road setup but it does power the wheels normally while automatically locking up the limited-slip rear differential when traction is call for. For messy road conditions it works well. However, for that occasional dirt road detour, the system also has a “locked” setting that holds power to the front and rear on a fixed basis.

    The Ridgeline sports four-wheel independent suspension supporting a closed-box unibody chassis that also has no body panel separation between the truck cab and box — still a unique design in the pickup segment.  The 6.5-foot bed (with tailgate down) will carry a full-sized ATV, something I have done with a Ridgeline previously. It will also accommodate the proverbial four-foot-wide sheet of plywood.  In short, its bed is useful.

    Also under the heading of unique is an underbed 8.5-cubic-foot storage compartment — or lockable trunk. This is a great feature as it keeps everything from groceries to valuable tools dry and out of sight. Just remember to keep the snow brushed off it — with just a couple of centimetres of the fluffy white stuff on it, it’s almost impossible to open.


    2:00 pm on February 8, 2012
     
  • DETROIT • Ford on Monday blasted General Motors over a snarky advertisement for GM trucks run during the Super Bowl broadcast, but stopped short of taking any kind of legal action.

    The ad, during what proved to be the most-watched U.S. television broadcast in history, showed Chevrolet Silverado trucks and their drivers surviving a 21st century apocalypse.


    “Where’s Dave?” asks one of the survivors.

    “Dave didn’t drive the longest-lasting, most dependable truck on the road. Dave drove a Ford,” replies his friend.

    Ford had sought to block the ad before Sunday’s broadcast of the U.S. football championship game, which drew 111.3 million viewers across the country.

    But GM went ahead, and the spot, based on ostensible Mayan forecasts of a 2012 apocalypse, became one of the most talked-about ads in the advertising-heavy broadcast.

    “We don’t agree with some of GM’s claims in their ad, particularly around durability” for Ford’s famous F-series pickup trucks, says Ford spokesman Mike Levine. “What’s important is that Ford F-Series is proud to be the best-selling truck in America for 35 years … and Ford is the brand with the most pickup trucks on the road with more than 250,000 miles — demonstrating just how durable our trucks are in the real world.”

    “Any further action will be up to our legal team,” he adds.

    Levine salso points out that Ford outsold Chevrolet by more than 70,000 units last year.

    Nevertheless, Chevrolet is expected to use the ad again on future television broadcasts.

    Pickup trucks account for 12% of all light-duty trucks sold in the U.S., and between them GM and Ford account for more than 70% of all sales. The trucks are also major profit centres for both companies.


    2:00 pm on February 7, 2012
     
  • One of my favourite vehicles is actually a Dodge truck, not a car. When I first started working around vehicles, I fooled around with old military trucks and Jeeps. The reason for this was that they were simple, extraordinarily rugged off-road vehicles and pretty cool. (When I was much younger, my sandbox had been littered with military Dinky Toys.)

    My favourite truck, the civilian Dodge Power Wagon, was a thinly disguised military vehicle that rose from the heavy-duty ¾-ton and one-ton trucks of the Second World War. The first generation was produced from 1946 until the mid-1960s. These trucks were massively overbuilt. When they were more common, it was not unusual to see one customized and festooned with all kinds of equipment such as massive plows, winches or drill rigs that would break the axles of most modern pickup trucks.

    A few weeks ago, a wonderful 1966 Power Wagon arrived at my facility. I was delighted because, as much as I love these trucks, this is the first one that had ever arrived here to be worked on. Funnily enough, while it is the first Power Wagon through my shop doors, it is so familiar because of all the Dodge M 37 military pickups and other Second World War Dodges I have owned and worked on. It was rather like an old friend had arrived.

    Its condition was excellent although unrestored and, if it was mine, I would keep the old, weathered yellow paint and blacked-out frame and just keep driving it.

    When I asked my general manager what the truck was in for, he told me the job was strictly utilitarian and that the owner wanted a modern powerplant installed and a newer transmission with overdrive for the occasional time the truck would be on the road. The frame was to be cleaned, prepped and repainted with a special black anti-oxidizing paint as well.

    It turns out this old truck’s working life is not over. It is being prepared to clear land and ready a building site for the owner’s new home. To be better prepared for this, he felt a modern diesel engine might be in order.

    I have to admit some personal reluctance here because the flathead six-cylinder that was in the old beast was one of the best-working motors ever built. In some of its incarnations, it was known as the Chrysler Industrial engine. This family of motors powered cars and trucks from the 1930s right through to the ’70s, when they could still be found in tow motors, Zambonis and other heavy equipment.

    The engine chosen to replace the original is a Cummins QSB 4.5. This is not a street diesel designed to push a chrome-bedecked urban powder-puff pickup. It is a very serious working motor designed to power heavy agricultural equipment. It would be as happy harvesting thousands of Prairie acres or even sitting at the bottom of a mineshaft pumping out water for a couple of decades.

    The installation of this engine and a rebuilt overdrive transmission has caused some trepidation here as they are far from drop-in. The re-engineering of the truck is daunting for the simple reason that we don’t want to change its outward appearance or modify it beyond the point where a restoration back to the original in the future would be next to impossible. That said, among the things we have to do is re-engineer the steering system, since the new engine will occupy the area where the old steering box was located. We also have to radically alter the whole front end, so there will be a number of factors that come into play in creating a new front suspension and steering gear.

    The unit that puts power to the front axle and PTO is found on a frame crossmember and is far too close to the new transmission, so we have to create a heavy-duty load-bearing crossmember and move the whole assembly backward about 38 centimetres or so. This will mean we have to make a new front driveshaft as well.

    The injection pump on the engine is in the wrong place and the truck’s frame cannot accommodate it at its point of attachment, so we will have to work with engineers at Cummins to relocate that unit.

    We have to move the truck’s firewall backward. This worries me as the Power Wagon doesn’t have a lot of legroom to start with. The truck will be no good if the owner can’t get in and out of it and operate the foot pedals easily — especially in a working situation — so we are going to have to be very clever in solving this problem.

    As the project progresses, there will be many challenges both large and small that crop up. Cooling is always an issue when blending old and new technologies.
    The electrical system in the Power Wagon will have to replaced with a brand new harness and we will have to install all the computers and high-tech required gadgets to run the turbocharged fuel-injected Cummins diesel.

    When it is finished, it should be a magnificent truck capable of another 50 years of heavy work and, if we have done our jobs properly, it will look no different than when it first poked its nose into the shop.


    9:00 am on January 16, 2012
     
  • I once had a client who was 79 years old when I first met him. He was a great client and even better friend. For the next 17 years, until his passing at age 96, we shared a close relationship, which revolved around antique and classic cars, art and many other common interests.

    I had the honour of both maintaining his collection of 20 or so cars and buying and selling cars within his collection as new gems came to light and older acquisitions started to bore him.

    One of his idiosyncrasies was that he could not for the life of him understand my attraction to antique and classic trucks. To him, trucks were quite simply what the gardener or other tradesmen used. As such, they held no more appeal to him than a wheelbarrow or lawnmower. In fact, until I absolutely forced him, horrified, into riding in one of my brand-new loaded Dodge 3500s, he had never been in a pickup. After a day of antiquing, he had to actually admit that the truck, with its wood trim, leather seats and fancy entertainment centre, was the equal of many luxury cars he had owned.

    It still didn’t change his mind about classic trucks and I could never talk him into acquiring one, not even a really rare and desirable 1936 Studebaker Coupe Express Pickup I had come across. This Studebaker was without a doubt the most beautiful and stylish pickup truck ever created. It had flowing Art Deco lines and smoothed and rounded box contours. It was quite simply a masterpiece. It was also an incredibly good investment, one that, had he bought it, would have appreciated several hundred per cent from the asking price at the time to what it would be worth today.

    Not too many years ago, buying an old pickup — even a nicely restored one — was the cheapest way of getting into the classic car hobby. But no matter how nice a truck it was, it did not have the cachet of a 1957 Chev or a ’50s Ford Crown Victoria.

    Over the years, I have owned several classic pickups. There is not one of them that I don’t miss or would never buy again. My favourite was a one-ton 1941 Fargo, a rare civilian truck, one of just six released in 1941 for farm use. The rest of that year’s production was for the military.

    Despite its humble destination and the fact that the Second World War was raging, that truck still bore the highly detailed planet Earth hood ornament and all the flashy stainless Deco trim on its hood, radiator shell and prominent fenders.

    Another great truck I owned was a 1948 Ford F-1. This one was also special because it had the very rare Ford six-cylinder flathead engine. These motors were installed in some pickups headed out to the U.S. grain belt. The reason was that, in the days after the war when things were still a bit tight, pickups often had to serve multiple roles from getting the family to the church on Sunday to ploughing the fields during the week. The six-cylinder had more grunt and was better at multi-tasking than the Ford flathead eights of the day.

    There are others that I miss and I wish I still had owned for two reasons. The first is that I just loved looking at them and playing with them. The second is that pickup  truck values have spiralled in value.

    Today, it is not uncommon to see well-restored pickups sell for in excess of $50,000. A 1949 Mercury pickup, a Canadian-only marque, sold recently at the Toronto collector car auction for $73,000 — an unheard-of sum for any truck up to a few years ago. In the United States, rare pickups such as the Studebaker I once tried to have my friend purchase for his collection can sell for more than $100,000. I think the first $250,000 classic truck is waiting just over the hill if, in fact, that price has not already been achieved somewhere.

    The new popularity of collector trucks is probably nurtured by the common acceptance of SUVs and trucks as primary vehicles and even luxury rides such as the Cadillac and Lincoln pickups.

    Trucks now hold a major part of the collector hobby and are near and dear to the hearts of many, but, to others, no matter how fancy or rare, they will always just be mundane devices to get lawnmowers to the lawn.


    2:00 pm on December 31, 2011